[WP1] [Party1] WP1: Draft 5, with all Affirmation Reviews implemented as Bylaws changes

[Kavouss Arasteh]

Dear Mathiew
Dear All,
Thank you very much for the draft.
I have noted reference to DOC.I understand that we are preparing  REVISED
BALAWS DEALING WITH transition AND POST ttransition
MAY YOU KINDLY ADVISE WHAT role DOC will BE EXPECTED TO PLAY AFTER TRANSION
please READ WHAT IS INCLUDED IN THE Draft


*Quote*

*4. DOC affirms its commitment to a multi-stakeholder, private sector led,
bottom-up policy development model for DNS technical coordination that acts
for the benefit of global Internet users. A private coordinating process,
the outcomes of which reflect the public interest, is best able to flexibly
meet the changing needs of the Internet and of Internet users.*



*The above are DOC commitments.*



*ICANN and DOC recognize that there is a group of participants that engage
in ICANN's processes to a greater extent than Internet users generally. To
ensure that its decisions are in the public interest, and not just the
interests of a particular set of stakeholders, ICANN commits to perform and
publish analyses of the positive and negative effects of its decisions on
the public, including any financial impact on the public, and the positive
or negative impact (if any) on the systemic security, stability and
resiliency of the DNS.*
*Unquote *
*Regards*
*Kavouss *

2015-03-17 11:51 GMT+01:00 Matthew Shears <mshears at cdt.org>:

>  Hi all
>
> Attached a revised version (incorporating feedback from Steve and Robin)
> of the paper on additional items that could be inserted in the bylaws,
> etc., from the Affirmation of commitments.
>
> Thoughts/comments very welcome.
>
> Matthew
>
>
> On 3/8/2015 9:03 PM, Robin Gross wrote:
>
> Thanks very much for this discussion paper, Matthew.  A few comments /
> suggestions redlined in the attached draft.
>
>  Thanks again,
> Robin
>
>
>
>
>
>  On Mar 8, 2015, at 1:05 PM, Matthew Shears wrote:
>
>
> Dear all - attached please find an overview of other elements of the AoC
> that need to be further discussed within the WP as well as some suggestions
> that could be brought into the bylaws.
>
> Looking forward to your thoughts/comments.
>
> Matthew
>
> On 3/4/2015 5:38 PM, Steve DelBianco wrote:
>
>  Regarding Kavouss’ point about the ATRT assessing the 'effectiveness of
> the GAC’.
> A deeper read of ICANN bylaws tells me that ‘effectiveness’ is part of
> what the structural reviews are about.   So while these structural reviews
> don’t actually assess the effectiveness of the GNSO, CCNSO, etc., they do
> make recommendations about how to improve the effectiveness.  (see bylaws
> below)
>
>   Section 4. PERIODIC REVIEW OF ICANN STRUCTURE AND OPERATIONS
>
>  1. The Board shall cause a periodic review of the performance and
> operation of each Supporting Organization, each Supporting Organization
> Council, each Advisory Committee (other than the Governmental Advisory
> Committee), and the Nominating Committee by an entity or entities
> independent of the organization under review. The goal of the review, to be
> undertaken pursuant to such criteria and standards as the Board shall
> direct, shall be to determine (i) whether that organization has a
> continuing purpose in the ICANN structure, and (ii) if so, whether any
> change in structure or operations is desirable to improve its effectiveness.
>
>
>   From: Steve DelBianco
> Date: Wednesday, March 4, 2015 at 5:27 PM
> To: Jordan Carter, "wp1 at icann.org"
> Cc: Matthew Shears, Fiona Asonga, ACCT-Staff
> Subject: WP1: Draft 5, with all Affirmation Reviews implemented as Bylaws
> changes
>
>    Draft v5 (attached) reflects the discussion/suggestions from our call
> on 4-Mar-2015.
>
>    From: Steve DelBianco
> Date: Monday, March 2, 2015 at 3:56 PM
> To: Jordan Carter, "wp1 at icann.org"
> Cc: Matthew Shears, Fiona Asonga, ACCT-Staff
> Subject: WP1: Draft 4, with all Affirmation Reviews implemented as Bylaws
> changes
>
>    here’s an updated doc for Matthew, Fiona, and me, where we are
> importing the *Affirmation of Commitments* Reviews into the ICANN
> Bylaws.  The last 2 pages of this doc show proposed bylaws language for all
> 4 reviews.
>
>   Matthew Shears also has draft language regarding other commitments from
> AoC that should be considered for import into ICANN bylaws.
>
>  Best,
>  Steve
>
>
>
>  <Proposals for incorporating additional elements of the AoC v1.docx>
> _______________________________________________
> WP1 mailing list
> WP1 at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp1
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> WP1 mailing list
> WP1 at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp1
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wp1/attachments/20150317/12ab0cfd/attachment.html>