[WP1] Breakout on Decision-making model

[Greg Shatan]

I agree with Jordan and Mike; however, I believe this is what the table
reflects.  Note the difference in phrasing between lines 2 and 3 ("approve"
vs. "block").

Greg

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Jordan Carter <jordan at internetnz.net.nz>
wrote:

> hi Roelof
>
> I am not Steve but my understanding is the same as yours. For changes to
> fundamental bylaws, it is an active approval process.
>
> best
> Jordan
>
>
> On 19 October 2015 at 09:19, Roelof Meijer <Roelof.Meijer at sidn.nl> wrote:
>
>> Steve, this looks good.
>> I have a question about the fundamental bylaw part however. Is the idea
>> that there will be "passive approval "(if the community does noting to
>> prevent it, the board can change fundamental bylaws by itself) and "active
>> disapproval" (if the board decides to change a fundamental bylaw and
>> someone disagrees, we kick of the the process)?
>>
>> The table seems to indicate this, while I would expect “active approval”:
>> if the board woud want to change a fundamental bylaw, the board would have
>> to start a process to get approval from the community (eventually meaning
>> obtaining  a minimum of 4 supports and a maximum of 1 objection)
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Roelof
>>
>> From: <wp1-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Steve DelBianco <
>> sdelbianco at netchoice.org>
>> Date: zaterdag 17 oktober 2015 15:45
>> To: "wp1 at icann.org" <wp1 at icann.org>
>>
>> Subject: [WP1] Breakout on Decision-making model
>>
>> Attached is a doc showing photo of original and presented boards, plus a
>> table for what we presented.
>>
>> Required Community Powers
>>
>> Should we have a
>>
>> Conference
>>
>> Call?
>>
>> Should we Convene Community Forum?
>>
>> Do we have Consensus Support for this decision?
>>
>>
>>
>> 1. Block a proposed Operating Plan/Strategic Plan/Budget
>>
>> 2 support
>>
>> 3 support
>>
>> 4 support, and no more than 1 objection
>>
>>
>>
>> 2. Approve changes to Fundamental Bylaws and Articles of Incorporation
>>
>> 2 support
>>
>> 3 support
>>
>> 4 support, and no more than 1 objection
>>
>>
>>
>> 3. Block changes to regular bylaws
>>
>> 2 support
>>
>> 2 support
>>
>> 3 support, and no more than 1 objection
>>
>>
>>
>> 4. Remove individual board directors
>>
>> 2 support
>>
>> 2 support
>>
>> 3 support, and no more than 1 objection
>>
>>
>>
>> 5. Recall the entire board of directors
>>
>> 2 support
>>
>> 3 support
>>
>> 4 support, and no more than 1 objection*
>>
>> *
>>
>> 6. Mechanism for binding IRP where a panel decision is enforceable in any
>> court recognizing international arbitration results
>>
>> 2 support
>>
>> 2 support
>>
>> 3 support, and no more than 1 objection
>>
>> Mediation before IRP
>>
>> 7. Reconsider/reject board decisions relating to reviews of IANA
>> functions, including trigger of PTI separation
>>
>> 2 support
>>
>> 3 support
>>
>> 4 support, and no more than 1 objection
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> WP1 mailing list
>> WP1 at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp1
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Jordan Carter
>
> Chief Executive
> *InternetNZ*
>
> +64-4-495-2118 (office) | +64-21-442-649 (mob)
> Email: jordan at internetnz.net.nz
> Skype: jordancarter
> Web: www.internetnz.nz
>
> *A better world through a better Internet *
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> WP1 mailing list
> WP1 at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp1
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wp1/attachments/20151019/4220c5a9/attachment-0001.html>