[WP2] Status of Mission, Commitments, and Core Values following our call

[Paul Rosenzweig]

OK . I see that now.  Thanks.  I will look, with interest at the next draft
of the Bylaw revision in response to the stress test then.  This is a much
cleaner way to do it.  

 

Paul

 

Paul Rosenzweig

 <mailto:paul.rosenzweigesq at redbranchconsulting.com>
paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com 

O: +1 (202) 547-0660

M: +1 (202) 329-9650

VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739

Skype: paul.rosenzweig1066

 
<http://www.redbranchconsulting.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=articl
e&id=19&Itemid=9> Link to my PGP Key

 

 

From: Burr, Becky [mailto:Becky.Burr at neustar.biz] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 12:41 PM
To: Paul Rosenzweig; wp2 at icann.org
Cc: 'Thomas Rickert'
Subject: Re: [WP2] Status of Mission, Commitments, and Core Values following
our call

 

No, you are not reading it correctly.  We are adding a general prohibition
on ICANN acting on any advice of any advisory committee that would require
ICANN to exceed its Mission or violate its bylaws.  That is added to the
General section at the beginning of Article XI

 

J. Beckwith Burr

Neustar, Inc. / Deputy General Counsel and Chief Privacy Officer

1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20006

Office: + 1.202.533.2932  Mobile:  +1.202.352.6367  / becky.burr at neustar.biz
<mailto:becky.burr at neustar.biz>  / www.neustar.biz <http://www.neustar.biz> 

 

From: Paul Rosenzweig <paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com
<mailto:paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com> >
Date: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 at 12:19 PM
To: Becky Burr <becky.burr at neustar.biz <mailto:becky.burr at neustar.biz> >,
"wp2 at icann.org <mailto:wp2 at icann.org> " <wp2 at icann.org
<mailto:wp2 at icann.org> >
Cc: 'Thomas Rickert' <thomas at rickert.net <mailto:thomas at rickert.net> >
Subject: RE: [WP2] Status of Mission, Commitments, and Core Values following
our call

 

Am I reading this correctly Becky, that we decided to deal with the GAC
issue by simply deleting it all together and standing silent?  If so, how
will we respond to the NTIA when it asks about our satisfaction of Stress
Test 18?  I rather liked Malcolm's formulation which capture my own views
quite well .

 

Cheers

P

 

Paul Rosenzweig

 <mailto:paul.rosenzweigesq at redbranchconsulting.com>
paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com

O: +1 (202) 547-0660

M: +1 (202) 329-9650

VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739

Skype: paul.rosenzweig1066

 
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.redbranchconsulting
.com_index.php-3Foption-3Dcom-5Fcontent-26view-3Darticle-26id-3D19-26Itemid-
3D9&d=AwMFAg&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrxdYahOP8W
DDkMr4k&m=31EuPGF3Ejp12RTmrCm8odV-O_bo1eebq4Nv1Cw2OVg&s=OQ89NS0ilOejxhNSJioe
_NQCteDuUIuEgQK43sro41Q&e=> Link to my PGP Key

 

 

From: Burr, Becky [mailto:Becky.Burr at neustar.biz] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 11:46 AM
To: wp2 at icann.org <mailto:wp2 at icann.org> 
Cc: Thomas Rickert
Subject: [WP2] Status of Mission, Commitments, and Core Values following our
call
Importance: High

 

Please let me know if I have omitted or improperly implemented anything as
soon as possible.  We will be circulating to larger group in advance of CCWG
call later today.

J. Beckwith Burr

Neustar, Inc. / Deputy General Counsel and Chief Privacy Officer

1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20006

Office: + 1.202.533.2932  Mobile:  +1.202.352.6367  /
<mailto:becky.burr at neustar.biz> becky.burr at neustar.biz / www.neustar.biz
<http://www.neustar.biz> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wp2/attachments/20150721/0b269e80/attachment-0001.html>