[WP2] this is the document we'll use for our discussion of the IRP

[James Gannon]

+1 Avri

-----Original Message-----
From: wp2-bounces at icann.org [mailto:wp2-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 12:23 PM
To: wp2 at icann.org
Subject: Re: [WP2] this is the document we'll use for our discussion of the IRP

Hi,

I certainly expect ICANN to pay for any appeal the SM brings.

As for others, I think we need to find a way to defray costs, and would not mind seeing a sliding scale and a fund to cover it.  But would see this is a WS2 aspiration.

avri

On 23-Jul-15 12:55, Malcolm Hutty wrote:
>
> On 22/07/2015 23:56, Greg Shatan wrote:
>> This is merely a first draft, and more to demonstrate that it is manageable task we have to revise the Bylaws appropriately.
> Please find attached my proposed revisions.
>
> As well as track changes, I have included justifications in the 
> comments balloons.
>
> I also have two questions:
>
> * Why is the Sole Member selected as the vehicle for 
> community-initiated IRP? Wouldn't a more response community entity be 
> more appropriate? Some IRP challenges may be entirely irrelevant to 
> some parts of the community represented in the Sole Member - what does 
> ASO care about .africa, for example?
>
> * When you say that ICANN should pay for "all aspects" of the IRP, 
> what do you mean? Do you intend ICANN to pay applicants legal bills?
>
> Malcolm.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> WP2 mailing list
> WP2 at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp2


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

_______________________________________________
WP2 mailing list
WP2 at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp2