[WP2] this is the document we'll use for our discussion of the IRP

[Avri Doria]

Hi,

I certainly expect ICANN to pay for any appeal the SM brings.

As for others, I think we need to find a way to defray costs, and would
not mind seeing a sliding scale and a fund to cover it.  But would see
this is a WS2 aspiration.

avri

On 23-Jul-15 12:55, Malcolm Hutty wrote:
>
> On 22/07/2015 23:56, Greg Shatan wrote:
>> This is merely a first draft, and more to demonstrate that it is manageable task we have to revise the Bylaws appropriately.
> Please find attached my proposed revisions.
>
> As well as track changes, I have included justifications in the comments
> balloons.
>
> I also have two questions:
>
> * Why is the Sole Member selected as the vehicle for community-initiated
> IRP? Wouldn't a more response community entity be more appropriate? Some
> IRP challenges may be entirely irrelevant to some parts of the community
> represented in the Sole Member - what does ASO care about .africa, for
> example?
>
> * When you say that ICANN should pay for "all aspects" of the IRP, what
> do you mean? Do you intend ICANN to pay applicants legal bills?
>
> Malcolm.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> WP2 mailing list
> WP2 at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp2


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus