[WP2] this is the document we'll use for our discussion of the IRP

[Malcolm Hutty]

On 22/07/2015 23:56, Greg Shatan wrote:
> This is merely a first draft, and more to demonstrate that it is manageable task we have to revise the Bylaws appropriately.

Please find attached my proposed revisions.

As well as track changes, I have included justifications in the comments
balloons.

I also have two questions:

* Why is the Sole Member selected as the vehicle for community-initiated
IRP? Wouldn't a more response community entity be more appropriate? Some
IRP challenges may be entirely irrelevant to some parts of the community
represented in the Sole Member - what does ASO care about .africa, for
example?

* When you say that ICANN should pay for "all aspects" of the IRP, what
do you mean? Do you intend ICANN to pay applicants legal bills?

Malcolm.

-- 
            Malcolm Hutty | tel: +44 20 7645 3523
   Head of Public Affairs | Read the LINX Public Affairs blog
 London Internet Exchange | http://publicaffairs.linx.net/

                 London Internet Exchange Ltd
           21-27 St Thomas Street, London SE1 9RY

         Company Registered in England No. 3137929
       Trinity Court, Trinity Street, Peterborough PE1 1DA


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Independent Review Bylaws revised per WP2 draft 2.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 34486 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wp2/attachments/20150723/c5b67686/IndependentReviewBylawsrevisedperWP2draft2-0001.docx>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Independent Review Bylaws revised per WP2 draft 2.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 293152 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wp2/attachments/20150723/c5b67686/IndependentReviewBylawsrevisedperWP2draft2-0001.pdf>