[WP2] this is the current text of the Mission Commitments and Core Values language

[Burr, Becky]

Clarity, expectation setting, and clarity regarding redress in the event
of a violation (I.e., via IRP) is the value and rationale.  What is the
harm? 

 
J. Beckwith Burr
Neustar, Inc. / Deputy General Counsel and Chief Privacy Officer
1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20006
Office: + 1.202.533.2932  Mobile:  +1.202.352.6367  /
becky.burr at neustar.biz / www.neustar.biz






On 7/23/15, 9:28 AM, "Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch"
<Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch> wrote:

>If it that is the case under current Bylaws what is the rationale and
>value-added of the proposed change?
>
>
>
>To draw an analogy from constitutional law: it is said normally once that
>any branch of government has to abide by the constitution. There is no
>need to repeat that when talking for instance about executive action
>pursuant to some advisory council recommendation.
>
>
>
>best
>
>
>
>Jorge Cancio
>
>
>
>Von meinem iPhone gesendet
>
>
>
>Am 23.07.2015 um 15:23 schrieb Burr, Becky
><Becky.Burr at neustar.biz<mailto:Becky.Burr at neustar.biz>>:
>
>
>
>Correct Greg -
>
>
>
><<As I read the Bylaws (as revised and currently), if the GAC gives
>Advice​ that would require ICANN to exceed its mission or violate its
>Bylaws, that should trigger a consultation, which presumably would be
>used to determine how to revise the advice so that ICANN can act on the
>advice while adhering to its mission and Bylaws.>>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>
>WP2 mailing list
>
>WP2 at icann.org<mailto:WP2 at icann.org>
>
>https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_
>listinfo_wp2&d=AwIGaQ&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjD
>mrxdYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=9ndSYbSIwWhmiJtl1nOF_HCYCHJbhHqieg2TA5OMqh0&s=7WwRLeI
>5NLKwjpIXUQlU8GwnCwMMyPQ_2oO3QEwG6v4&e=
>