[WP2] IRP Checklist

[Malcolm Hutty]

>> Also, I would rather see a shorter term with one renewal, say 4+4,
>> rather than a straight 7 years, so that an under-whelming panelist
>> can be non-renewed and thus replaced more quickly,
> 
> Who decide who is "under-whelming" in this scenario?

On 27/07/2015 12:23, Greg Shatan wrote:
> The same group that chose the panelists and will choose their
> successors.

Is that an arbitration services provider that the Board contracts with,
or the Board itself?



-- 
            Malcolm Hutty | tel: +44 20 7645 3523
   Head of Public Affairs | Read the LINX Public Affairs blog
 London Internet Exchange | http://publicaffairs.linx.net/

                 London Internet Exchange Ltd
           21-27 St Thomas Street, London SE1 9RY

         Company Registered in England No. 3137929
       Trinity Court, Trinity Street, Peterborough PE1 1DA