[WP2] IRP Checklist

[Izumi Okutani]

Becky,


Thanks for your work and this checklist.

It's not within the list of questions but I'd like to make the text suggestion below.
This is a follow up to my comment in Paris to keep the numbers community related matters out of scope.

1.	Scope of Authority
The role of the Independent Review Process (IRP) will be to:
- Determine whether ICANN has acted (or has failed to act) in violation of its Bylaws; and
- Hearing claims involving rights of the Sole Member under the Bylaws (subject to voting thresholds)

[Add]
- Disputes related to Internet number resources are out of scope of the IRP.

Thanks,
Izumi

On 2015/07/25 0:25, Burr, Becky wrote:
> I�m attaching the current doc, in which I have tried to incorporate all input.  We need to reach closure on the following questions:
> 
> 
>   1.  Overflow panelists � yes or no
>   2.  Single panelist decisions � yes or no
>   3.  Standard for appeal to full panel - �clear error of judgment or application of an incorrect legal standard� - is this the right standard
>   4.  Community override of bone-headed decisions � yes or no
>   5.  Length of term
>   6.  Term renewal � yes or no
>   7.  Exhaustion requirement � yes, no, �where applicable� (not sure I know how to implement third option)
> 
> J. Beckwith Burr
> Neustar, Inc. / Deputy General Counsel and Chief Privacy Officer
> 1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20006
> Office: + 1.202.533.2932  Mobile:  +1.202.352.6367  / becky.burr at neustar.biz<mailto:becky.burr at neustar.biz> / www.neustar.biz
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> WP2 mailing list
> WP2 at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp2
>