[WP2] current state of IRP checklist plus sample bylaws language and the comment summary

[Burr, Becky]

That seems sensible to me

J. Beckwith Burr
Neustar, Inc. / Deputy General Counsel and Chief Privacy Officer
1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20006
Office: + 1.202.533.2932  Mobile:  +1.202.352.6367  / becky.burr at neustar.biz<mailto:becky.burr at neustar.biz> / www.neustar.biz

From: David Post <david.g.post at gmail.com<mailto:david.g.post at gmail.com>>
Date: Monday, July 27, 2015 at 4:28 PM
To: Becky Burr <becky.burr at neustar.biz<mailto:becky.burr at neustar.biz>>
Cc: Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin at melbourneit.com.au<mailto:Bruce.Tonkin at melbourneit.com.au>>, "WP2 at icann.org<mailto:WP2 at icann.org>" <WP2 at icann.org<mailto:WP2 at icann.org>>
Subject: Re: [WP2] current state of IRP checklist plus sample bylaws language and the comment summary

Isn't this something that we could leave for the IRP itself to deal with in its processes/procedures?  Why do we have to specify a limitations period in advance?
David


At 12:42 PM 7/25/2015, Burr, Becky wrote:
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
         boundary="_000_D1D9347138C0Ebeckyburrneustarbiz_"

The more I think about this 30 day thing, the more concerned I get – we need to provide for tolling the period for the pre filing mediation/CEP

J. Beckwith Burr

Neustar, Inc. / Deputy General Counsel and Chief Privacy Officer

1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20006

Office: + 1.202.533.2932  Mobile:  +1.202.352.6367  / becky.burr at neustar.biz<mailto:becky.burr at neustar.biz> / www.neustar.biz<http://www.neustar.biz/>

From: Bruce Tonkin < Bruce.Tonkin at melbourneit.com.au<mailto:Bruce.Tonkin at melbourneit.com.au>>
Date: Saturday, July 25, 2015 at 3:31 AM
To: "WP2 at icann.org<mailto:WP2 at icann.org>" <WP2 at icann.org<mailto:WP2 at icann.org>>
Subject: Re: [WP2] current state of IRP checklist plus sample bylaws language and the comment summary

Hello Becky,

The proposed bylaws language change with respect to the timing of an IRP proceeding:

“A request for A request for independent review must be filed within thirty days of the posting
of the minutes of the Board meeting (and the accompanying Board Briefing
Materials, if available) thatthe requesting party becoming aware of the action
that it contends demonstrates that ICANN violated its Bylaws or Articles of
Incorporation. Consolidated requests may be appropriate when the causal
connection between the circumstances of the requests and the harm is the same
for each of the requesting parties.”

How would you determine when a “requesting party” becomes aware of an action?     I expect it would be hard to determine when that event would happen – so this feels a little like that a party can file at any time after a decision – potentially years later.    This could have quite negative effect on a third party.   E.g if a new gTLD was allocated to an applicant, and then the requesting party complains years later.

Shouldn’t there be some limit based on what is reasonable – e.g 30 days after the requesting party would reasonably become aware … etc

Alternatively – maybe leave the current language and increase the time period – e.g. from 30 to 60 or 90 days.


Regards,
Bruce Tonkin

_______________________________________________
WP2 mailing list
WP2 at icann.org<mailto:WP2 at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp2<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_listinfo_wp2&d=AwMFAw&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrxdYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=KHtNBFAfs2Wsc0WBFs8uEwqFYvujsUnnN7VF0NWZxXM&s=45ha7ijUSShcMnUJqDwfzDUnJjMkMmkR1KbGauQJpno&e=>

*******************************
David G Post - Senior Fellow, Open Technology Institute/New America Foundation
blog (Volokh Conspiracy) http://www.washingtonpost.com/people/david-post
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.washingtonpost.com_people_david-2Dpost&d=AwMFAw&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrxdYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=KHtNBFAfs2Wsc0WBFs8uEwqFYvujsUnnN7VF0NWZxXM&s=xaEAsKtTS7zpk7-yKBnscwHrcrjC9EVm7Oh262_h49M&e=>book (Jefferson's Moose)  http://tinyurl.com/c327w2n       <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__tinyurl.com_c327w2n-25A0-25A0-25A0-25A0-25A0-25A0-25A0&d=AwMFAw&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrxdYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=KHtNBFAfs2Wsc0WBFs8uEwqFYvujsUnnN7VF0NWZxXM&s=uM7352AWlE5xVa8yoG0L-5mdpe1x-SSRtiX76IYGO50&e=>
music http://tinyurl.com/davidpostmusic <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__tinyurl.com_davidpostmusic-25A0&d=AwMFAw&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrxdYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=KHtNBFAfs2Wsc0WBFs8uEwqFYvujsUnnN7VF0NWZxXM&s=-hz2E2fMrdSb7NY0HOElRP-1Pij5y19kvB47QkcD5J4&e=> publications etc.  http://www.davidpost.com         <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.davidpost.com-25C2-25A0-25C2-25A0-25C2-25A0-25C2-25A0-25C2-25A0-25C2-25A0-25C2-25A0-25C2-25A0-25C2-25A0_&d=AwMFAw&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrxdYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=KHtNBFAfs2Wsc0WBFs8uEwqFYvujsUnnN7VF0NWZxXM&s=Orueb-zlDxfxaAOPf-NA3gwoi716R30h9Po7O6LtYEY&e=>
*******************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wp2/attachments/20150727/ed888009/attachment-0001.html>