[WP2] Lawyers markup of IRP checklist

Thu Jul 30 15:21:24 UTC 2015

What is the proper forum for these numbers related disputes (not that I can
think of a basis for one right now)?  Particularly if it is the Board
action that is being disputed?  Is there a numbers IRP somewhere, or is
this a "go directly to court" scenario?

On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Burr, Becky <Becky.Burr at neustar.biz>
wrote:

> Will do Izumi
>
> J. Beckwith Burr
> Neustar, Inc. / Deputy General Counsel and Chief Privacy Officer
> 1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20006
> Office: + 1.202.533.2932  Mobile:  +1.202.352.6367  /
> becky.burr at neustar.biz / www.neustar.biz
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 7/30/15, 10:52 AM, "Izumi Okutani" <izumi at nic.ad.jp> wrote:
>
> >Becky,
> >
> >
> >As a follow up from Paris and my previous e-mail -
> >
> >May I request to add a language in the IRP to keep the number resources
> >related issues to be out of scope of the IRP?
> >I recall this was agreed in Paris and would be helpful to have it
> >reflected in the IRP document.
> >
> >> 1. Scope of Authority
> >> The role of the Independent Review Process (IRP) will be to:
> >> - Determine whether ICANN has acted (or has failed to act) in violation
> >>of its Bylaws; and
> >> - Hearing claims involving rights of the Sole Member under the Bylaws
> >>(subject to voting thresholds)
> >>
> >> [Add]
> >> - Disputes related to Internet number resources are out of scope of the
> >>IRP.
> >
> >
> >I would like to suggest the same text for reconsideration para 07.
> >
> >
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_d
> >ownload_attachments_52888740_28-2520July-2520Annotated-2520Recon-2520Enhan
> >cements-2520Section.pdf-3Fversion-3D1-26modificationDate-3D1438115397000-2
> >6api-3Dv2&d=AwICAg&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrx
> >dYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=tHscvYrZekCdmHOY3EYpQrfpCOOH-UUO1Ua46kIGIiY&s=SFTBYIDQqP
> >peE5tVN6BQ7GTWqTFL-SiD2Wvc65AmGUA&e=
> >
> >CURRENT:
> >In case of including the global number resources policy in its scope,
> >further considerations
> >should be made of its implications. The bottom up policy development
> >process and its
> >forum for the number resources is outside the ICANN, even though the
> >ICANN Board
> >approves its global policies, and the same mechanisms as the names
> >related policies may
> >not be applicable
> >
> >SUGGESTED:
> >Disputes related to Internet number resources are out of scope of the IRP.
> >
> >
> >Thanks for all your work!
> >
> >
> >Izumi on behalf of the ASO reps
> >
> >On 2015/07/30 22:53, Burr, Becky wrote:
> >> Ok, do you object to publishing the checklist as a highlights document?
> >>
> >> J. Beckwith Burr
> >> Neustar, Inc. / Deputy General Counsel and Chief Privacy Officer
> >> 1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20006
> >> Office: + 1.202.533.2932  Mobile:  +1.202.352.6367  /
> >> becky.burr at neustar.biz / www.neustar.biz
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 7/30/15, 8:24 AM, "Malcolm Hutty" <malcolm at linx.net> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Becky,
> >>>
> >>> I'm surprised to see the lawyers working on this "Checklist", surely
> >>> this document was just a working document, and not intended for
> >>> inclusion in the final report?
> >>>
> >>> Do I mistake your intention?
> >>>
> >>> I have just seen the wiki page for building the final report
> >>>
> >>>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org
> >>>_p
> >>>
> >>>ages_viewpage.action-3FpageId-3D53783460&d=AwIF-g&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lUL
> >>>rw
> >>>
> >>>&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrxdYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=q4Ixib85lRk7msOyZx0knoI
> >>>8_
> >>> 8b7kOOW4k7joT9uOBM&s=HaYn6AtyGfXg3H_FBdoLo0BWJaOeCiv770giH0CLZSo&e=
> >>>
> >>> This also lists this checklist as the WP2's input to the report on the
> >>> IRP.
> >>>
> >>> I was hoping to see the attached draft bylaws "28 July Independent
> >>> Review Bylaw BB compilation" (or any successor draft) listed there
> >>> instead.
> >>>
> >>> Please could you confirm that that is your intention?
> >>>
> >>> Could you please submit this document and ask the staff to update this
> >>> wiki asap?
> >>>
> >>> We do not want people to start challenging our input to the final paper
> >>> on the grounds it hasn't been made available to the CCWG plenary in
> >>>time.
> >>>
> >>> For the record, I do not regard the Checklist document as complete,
> >>> either in terms of being comprehensive as to the issues we have
> >>> addressed in the other document, nor in terms of containing sufficient
> >>> detail.
> >>>
> >>> We're getting very close to the Chair's intended freeze date, and not
> >>> having text visibly submitted, and having the lawyer's working on
> >>> something else, is making me nervous. We don't have the time to allow
> >>> misunderstandings to develop at this stage.
> >>>
> >>> Malcolm.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 30/07/2015 12:24, Burr, Becky wrote:
> >>>> I have gone through the changes proposed by counsel.  Most of them are
> >>>> wording changes and not objectionable from my perspective.  There is
> >>>>one
> >>>> substantive addition on independence introduced in the qualifications
> >>>> section.  We have not discussed this and I think it is addressed in
> >>>>the
> >>>> current checklist, so I propose not to take that change.  Any other
> >>>> thoughts on this?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> J. Beckwith Burr
> >>>>
> >>>> *Neustar, Inc. /* Deputy General Counsel and Chief Privacy Officer
> >>>>
> >>>> 1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20006
> >>>>
> >>>> Office: + 1.202.533.2932  Mobile:
> >>>> +1.202.352.6367  / becky.burr at neustar.biz
> >>>> <mailto:becky.burr at neustar.biz> / www.neustar.biz
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> WP2 mailing list
> >>>> WP2 at icann.org
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailm
> >>>>an
> >>>>
> >>>>_listinfo_wp2&d=AwIF-g&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo
> >>>>8T
> >>>>
> >>>>jDmrxdYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=q4Ixib85lRk7msOyZx0knoI8_8b7kOOW4k7joT9uOBM&s=6D
> >>>>Di
> >>>> xNHik4GjoPkZcf6OqQEcSMFfpfVuTb6hjbh_boM&e=
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>>            Malcolm Hutty | tel: +44 20 7645 3523
> >>>   Head of Public Affairs | Read the LINX Public Affairs blog
> >>> London Internet Exchange |
> >>>
> >>>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__publicaffairs.linx.n
> >>>et
> >>>
> >>>_&d=AwIF-g&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrxdYahOP
> >>>8W
> >>>
> >>>DDkMr4k&m=q4Ixib85lRk7msOyZx0knoI8_8b7kOOW4k7joT9uOBM&s=O5oklRtKYnjhtBWn
> >>>0j
> >>> eCtYRiYHGXvX0T5MVu8cvp28U&e=
> >>>
> >>>                 London Internet Exchange Ltd
> >>>           21-27 St Thomas Street, London SE1 9RY
> >>>
> >>>         Company Registered in England No. 3137929
> >>>       Trinity Court, Trinity Street, Peterborough PE1 1DA
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> WP2 mailing list
> >> WP2 at icann.org
> >>
> >>
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman
> >>_listinfo_wp2&d=AwICAg&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8T
> >>jDmrxdYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=tHscvYrZekCdmHOY3EYpQrfpCOOH-UUO1Ua46kIGIiY&s=p6Ai
> >>eG-viFQu1M96FmyRnFaLvz52hgtVUWimtSL1nGc&e=
> >>
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >WP2 mailing list
> >WP2 at icann.org
> >
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__mm.icann.org_mailman_
> >listinfo_wp2&d=AwICAg&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjD
> >mrxdYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=tHscvYrZekCdmHOY3EYpQrfpCOOH-UUO1Ua46kIGIiY&s=p6AieG-
> >viFQu1M96FmyRnFaLvz52hgtVUWimtSL1nGc&e=
>
> _______________________________________________
> WP2 mailing list
> WP2 at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp2
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wp2/attachments/20150730/4e6077ff/attachment-0001.html>