[Wp4] Fwd: Re: [] Variety of formulation for Human Rights bylaw that were made. - corrected

[Nigel Roberts]

I am not sure that Greg's statement can be read as "no major change". I 
fully support his assessment of where we are (which is that we come from 
different starting points).


We need to understand (and if necessary define) what the objective is.

Then we need to come to consensus on a high-level statement to 
incorporate as a By-Law.

Then, in WS2, we must "give colour and depth" to the high-level statement.



> On 06-Aug-15 15:12, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
>>
>> I like to add my +1 to Greg on this one; Committing to a general HR
>> statement that is not clearly scored/defined could be dangerous,
>> especially as we would not like any major change to be done on
>> anything that has been agreed upon in WS1
>>