[Wp4] Revised bylaw language by counsel

[Nigel Roberts]

Very clever. I am in awe of the mind behind this.

When interpreted by a court, this new proposal removes any last 
obligation on ICANN to have any obligations for human rights whatsoever. 
The exercise on how this is done is left to the constructionist lawyers 
among us.

But here's my take. Taking the blue lined suggested additions, it all 
depends on the construction on the term 'applicable law' in California.

This is even more unacceptable.

On 11/05/2015 09:58 PM, León Felipe Sánchez Ambía wrote:
> Attached are the redline and clean versions of the work our counsel did. I believe this could be, subject to this group’s consensus, the final version for inclusion in our 3rd proposal.