[Wp4] CCWG - WP4 Poll on referencing existing documents
Seun Ojedeji
seun.ojedeji at gmail.com
Wed Oct 7 02:14:53 UTC 2015
Question 1: No - whatever is in the bylaw affects the 3 operational
communities one way or the other. At least 2 of those communities (IETF,
RIR, plus some ccTLDs) don't have such hard-coding in their governing
documents. Let's not sperate IANA earlier than we thought.
Question 2 & 3: N/A
Thanks
Sent from my Asus Zenfone2
Kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 7 Oct 2015 01:13, "Bernard Turcotte" <turcotte.bernard at gmail.com> wrote:
> All,
>
> Following today's WP4 it was decided to poll the WP4 participants on the
> subject of referring to existing human rights instruments or not.
>
> Please complete the following by 23:59 UTC Wednesday October 7th 2015 by
> replying to the WP4 list:
>
>
> - Question 1 - Should there be a reference to
> a
> specific document in the Bylaws text regarding human rights proposed
> by the CCWG (Yes or No)?
> - Question 2 - If a document reference is included should it be the
> UDHR (yes or no)?
> - Question 3 - If not UDHR what other document or documents should be
> referred to (list)?
>
>
> Thank you.
>
> Staff for Leon Sanchez.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wp4 mailing list
> Wp4 at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp4
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wp4/attachments/20151007/8249e01f/attachment.html>
More information about the Wp4
mailing list