[Wp4] CCWG - WP4 Poll on referencing existing documents

Seun Ojedeji seun.ojedeji at gmail.com
Wed Oct 7 02:14:53 UTC 2015


Question 1: No - whatever is in the bylaw affects the 3 operational
communities one way or the other. At least 2 of those communities (IETF,
RIR, plus some ccTLDs) don't have such hard-coding in their governing
documents. Let's not sperate IANA earlier than we thought.

Question 2 & 3: N/A

Thanks

Sent from my Asus Zenfone2
Kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 7 Oct 2015 01:13, "Bernard Turcotte" <turcotte.bernard at gmail.com> wrote:

> All,
>
> Following today's WP4 it was decided to poll the WP4 participants on the
> subject of referring to existing human rights instruments or not.
>
> Please complete the following by 23:59 UTC Wednesday October 7th 2015 by
> replying to the WP4 list:
>
>
>    - Question 1 - Should there be a reference to
>    ​a ​
>    specific document in the Bylaws text regarding human rights proposed
>    by the CCWG (Yes or No)?
>    - Question 2 - If a document reference is included should it be the
>    UDHR (yes or no)?
>    - Question 3 - If not UDHR what other document or documents should be
>    referred to (list)?
>
>
> Thank you.
>
> Staff for Leon Sanchez.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wp4 mailing list
> Wp4 at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp4
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wp4/attachments/20151007/8249e01f/attachment.html>


More information about the Wp4 mailing list