[Wp4] CCWG - WP4 Poll on referencing existing documents

[Dr Eberhard W Lisse]

Nigel,

as much as I dislike to agree with ICANN Legal on anything :-)-O, Ms
Eisner may have a point here.

Not from a legal perspective, ie "as ratified" but from the corporate
(including entering into (future) financial commitments "blindly").

I will go with the Consensus on this, but maybe we want to look at this
some more.

el

On 2015-10-07 10:53, Nigel Roberts wrote:
> 
> 
> On 07/10/15 01:54, Samantha Eisner wrote:
>> Question 1: No.  ICANN does not include references to other specific
>> documents in its governing documents, particularly external documents
>> that can be changed without ICANN’s consent or inputs.
>>
> 
> 
> With respect,
> 
> (a) the UDHR is not going to change.
> (b) the By Law can refer to the text as ratified.



-- 
Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse  \        / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar)
el at lisse.NA            / *     |   Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell)
PO Box 8421             \     /
Bachbrecht, Namibia     ;____/