[Wp4] CCWG - WP4 Poll on referencing existing documents

[Paul Twomey]

1 No
2 No
3 - my read is if one answers 1 and 2 with No then 3 is irrelevant.   I 
note that some others have, however, put in the UN Guiding Principles on 
Business and Human Rights for 3 even thought they have said no to 1 and 2.
I repeat my objection to the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human 
Rights because of the sections which would make ICANN responsible for 
the Human Rights actions of its associated parties (in ICANN's case I 
can see this being applied to the actions of ccTLDS in authoritarian 
countries).

Paul

On 10/7/15 11:10 AM, Bernard Turcotte wrote:
> All,
>
> Following today's WP4 it was decided to poll the WP4 participants on 
> the subject of referring to existing human rights instruments or not.
>
> Please complete the following by 23:59 UTC Wednesday October 7th 2015 
> by replying to the WP4 list:
>
>   * Question 1 - Should there be a reference to
>     ​a ​
>     specific document in the Bylaws text regarding human rights
>     proposed by the CCWG (Yes or No)?
>   * Question 2 - If a document reference is included should it be the
>     UDHR (yes or no)?
>   * Question 3 - If not UDHR what other document or documents should
>     be referred to (list)?
>
>
> Thank you.
>
> Staff for Leon Sanchez.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wp4 mailing list
> Wp4 at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp4

-- 
Dr Paul Twomey
Managing Director
Argo P at cific

US Cell: +1 310 279 2366
Aust M: +61 416 238 501

www.argopacific.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wp4/attachments/20151008/5c320273/attachment.html>