[Wp4] Discrete issue: Which bylaws formulation
Avri Doria
avri at acm.org
Mon Oct 12 21:52:35 UTC 2015
On 12-Oct-15 17:41, Matthew Shears wrote:
> I have to ask - how much actual support did the last two options get?hi,
According to the results listed by Leon:
> Q1 Yes - 5
> No - 18
>
> Q2 Yes - 11
> No - 12
>
> Q3 None or NA - 13
> Not Sure - 3
specific recommendations
2 for just Ruggie
2 for UDHR + Ruggie
6 for UDHR, ICCPR, ICESCR
> International bill of human rights , Regional and Domestic
> commitments to same.
> · my read is if one answers 1 and 2 with No then 3 is
> irrelevant. I note that some others have, however, put in the UN
> Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights for 3 even though they
> have said no to 1 and 2.
>
> that is be guided by the Guiding Principles on business and human
> rights
> · The UDHR is the only instrument that is of sufficient
> universality.
> · The UDHR is the only instrument that is of sufficient
> universality.
> · UDHR & UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights
> · UDHR & UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights
> · UDHR, ICCPR, ICESCR
> · UDHR, ICCPR, ICESCR
> · UDHR, ICCPR, ICESCR
> · UDHR, ICCPR, ICESCR
> · UDHR, ICCPR, ICESCR
> · UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights
>
>
> And what about highlighting the results for the 2 options in the
> proposal itself?
>
> Matthew
>
> On 12/10/2015 20:30, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Based on the outcome of the poll, I wonder why option 2 through to 4
>> will be applicable anymore. I quote below just incase:
>>
>> "....In brief, the WP has expressed in a vast majority that No
>> reference to a specific document should be included in the suggested
>> bylaw text."
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Sent from my Asus Zenfone2
>> Kindly excuse brevity and typos.
>>
>> On 12 Oct 2015 20:24, "Nigel Roberts" <nigel at channelisles.net
>> <mailto:nigel at channelisles.net>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I like this approach.
>>
>> The wording can be made more concise and less ambgiuous as follows.
>>
>> Here are the four alternatices.
>>
>>
>> 1. Within its mission and in its operations, ICANN will
>> respect internationally recognized human rights.
>>
>> 2. Within its mission and in its operations, ICANN will
>> respect the internationally recognized human rights set out in
>> the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
>>
>> 3. Within its mission and in its operations, ICANN will
>> respect the internationally recognized human rights set out in
>> the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International
>> Covenant on Cultural and Political Rights and the International
>> Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.
>>
>> 4. Within its mission and in its operations, ICANN will
>> respect the internationally recognized human rights set out in
>> the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International
>> Covenant on Cultural and Political Rights and the International
>> Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights and will carry
>> out its work guided by the UN Guiding Principles on Business and
>> Human Rights.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wp4 mailing list
>> Wp4 at icann.org <mailto:Wp4 at icann.org>
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp4
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wp4 mailing list
>> Wp4 at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp4
>
> --
>
> Matthew Shears
> Director - Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
> Center for Democracy & Technology
> mshears at cdt.org
> + 44 771 247 2987
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Avast logo <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>
>
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wp4 mailing list
> Wp4 at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp4
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
More information about the Wp4
mailing list