[Wp4] Discrete issue: Which bylaws formulation

Nigel Roberts nigel at channelisles.net
Tue Oct 13 06:45:56 UTC 2015


Seun

The CCWG as a whole needs to measure consensus of Members (not 
Participants) before anyone could claim consensus.

This would exclude me, for example. It would also exclude noisy Bill 
Hugginses.


On 12/10/15 21:21, Seun Ojedeji wrote:
> Okay so who decided to ignore the poll results? The WPs? I don't understand
> why you responded in such a manner, there was a poll that was made within
> this WP on the same subject and my understanding is that it is to determine
> what is to be recommended to CCWG.
>
> The question then is why are we still going ahead to recommend what we
> already have consensus within the WP not to recommend.
>
> If this is documented for due diligence purposes then it understandable and
> it will be good if you responded by clarifying and not just stating the
> obvious. Yes I may have missed some meetings where things were further
> discussed/updated and it will be fine if you just point to that and not
> just talk like the driver of this process!
>
> Regards
>
> Sent from my Asus Zenfone2
> Kindly excuse brevity and typos.
> On 12 Oct 2015 21:11, "Greg Shatan" <gregshatanipc at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Seun,
>>
>> Because the WPs are not decision making bodies.
>>
>> Greg
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Based on the outcome of the poll, I wonder why option 2 through to 4 will
>>> be applicable anymore. I quote below just incase:
>>>
>>> "....In brief, the WP has expressed in a vast majority that No reference
>>> to a specific document should be included in the suggested bylaw text."
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Sent from my Asus Zenfone2
>>> Kindly excuse brevity and typos.
>>> On 12 Oct 2015 20:24, "Nigel Roberts" <nigel at channelisles.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I like this approach.
>>>>
>>>> The wording can be made more concise and less ambgiuous as follows.
>>>>
>>>> Here are the four alternatices.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 1.       Within its mission and in its operations, ICANN will respect
>>>> internationally recognized human rights.
>>>>
>>>> 2.      Within its mission and in its operations, ICANN will respect the
>>>> internationally recognized human rights set out in the Universal
>>>> Declaration of Human Rights.
>>>>
>>>> 3.      Within its mission and in its operations, ICANN will respect the
>>>> internationally recognized human rights set out in the Universal
>>>> Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Cultural and
>>>> Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and
>>>> Cultural Rights.
>>>>
>>>> 4.       Within its mission and in its operations, ICANN will respect
>>>> the internationally recognized human rights set out in the Universal
>>>> Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Cultural and
>>>> Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and
>>>> Cultural Rights and will carry out its work guided by the UN Guiding
>>>> Principles on Business and Human Rights.
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Wp4 mailing list
>>>> Wp4 at icann.org
>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp4
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wp4 mailing list
>>> Wp4 at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp4
>>>
>>>
>>
>


More information about the Wp4 mailing list