[Wp4] Agenda for our call

[Greg Shatan]

Took me about 5 minutes to get an operator


On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Nigel Roberts <nigel at channelisles.net>
wrote:

> I've dialled in but all I get is a recorded message saying a co-ordinator
> will assist me momentarily repeated ad nauseam.
>
> On 30/10/15 14:57, Greg Shatan wrote:
>
>> As Tanya requested, I've uploaded the clean version of the document
>> circulated last night to Google Drive.  Here is the link:
>>
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bm0NnIq35j3-EwmBwKEjSOJia-c10wv0mhHytngTDiM/edit?usp=sharing
>>
>> Greg
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 7:15 AM, Dr. Tatiana Tropina <t.tropina at mpicc.de
>> <mailto:t.tropina at mpicc.de>> wrote:
>>
>>     Hi Greg,
>>     thanks a lot for providing this starting point for the rationale
>>     document and for pointing out that we have to proceed with what is
>>     meant to be "explanatory" document for the bylaw language. Would it
>>     be possible to share this new draft (clean version) as a Google doc,
>>     so anyone can work on it after (and during, may be) the call? I
>>     think Google docs were really helpful in our previous work. Only if
>>     you have time to do this, of course. Thanks a million!
>>     I also believe that we might consider changing the structure of the
>>     part which was meant to be the rationale document (the text from the
>>     old Google doc). I remember there were some comments and suggestion
>>     for amending/restructuring this "rationale" part in the Google doc
>>     itself and on the WP4 calls.  However, this can be discussed during
>>     the call. Or any time later.
>>     Looking forward to the call.
>>     Cheers
>>     Tanya
>>
>>     On 30/10/15 08:04, Greg Shatan wrote:
>>
>>>     All,
>>>
>>>     As promised, here is the document I propose as the starting point
>>>     for our drafting.  Since the portion where I edited down the
>>>     comment analysis is difficult to read in the marked version, I've
>>>     also included a clean version.
>>>
>>>     I look forward to our call.
>>>
>>>     Greg
>>>
>>>     On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 4:30 AM, Greg Shatan
>>>     <gregshatanipc at gmail.com <mailto:gregshatanipc at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>         Leon and all,
>>>
>>>         On point 3, I don't understand why we would be adding to or
>>>         amending the Second Public Comment document.  This document
>>>         has now been published as part of the CCWG's overall review of
>>>         the public comments.  I think this document is pretty much
>>> closed.
>>>
>>>         On the other hand, we were working on a rationale document in
>>>         a Google Doc before the public comment analysis and then
>>>         Dublin took over our lives.  I think what we need to do is
>>>         work on a document that uses as its starting point (i) the
>>>         second draft report section on human rights, (ii) pieces of
>>>         the rationale document, (iii) a fairly brief
>>>         discussion/analysis of the comments and (iv) the new material
>>>         provided by Leon.  The ultimate goal should be to turn this
>>>         into the human rights section of the next draft of the
>>>         report.  I've been working on such a document and should have
>>>         a draft shortly.  I won't have it as far along as I'd hoped,
>>>         due to a medical emergency in my family, but hopefully it will
>>>         be far enough along to give a sense of where it could go.
>>>
>>>         Greg
>>>
>>>         On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 3:29 AM, León Felipe Sánchez Ambía
>>>         <<mailto:leonfelipe at sanchez.mx>leonfelipe at sanchez.mx
>>>         <mailto:leonfelipe at sanchez.mx>> wrote:
>>>
>>>             Dear all,
>>>
>>>             In anticipation for our call, I suggest the following agenda:
>>>
>>>             1. Welcome
>>>             2. Explanation by Paul Twomey on practical steps involved
>>>             in changes of TLD operator (focused on ccTLD)
>>>             3. Review of proposed addition to our PC2 document
>>>             4 AOB
>>>
>>>             Of course, and as usual, this agenda is a suggestion and
>>>             open for amendments.
>>>
>>>             Staff,
>>>
>>>             Please be ready to display the document in the AC room.
>>>
>>>
>>>             Best regards,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>             León
>>>
>>>
>>>             _______________________________________________
>>>             Wp4 mailing list
>>>             Wp4 at icann.org <mailto:Wp4 at icann.org>
>>>             https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp4
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     Wp4 mailing list
>>>     Wp4 at icann.org  <mailto:Wp4 at icann.org>
>>>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp4
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wp4 mailing list
>> Wp4 at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp4
>>
>> _______________________________________________
> Wp4 mailing list
> Wp4 at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp4
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wp4/attachments/20151030/1e5f498f/attachment-0001.html>