[Wp4] Agenda for our call
Nigel Roberts
nigel at channelisles.net
Fri Oct 30 15:14:44 UTC 2015
I'm in now, but no access to Adobe.
I've been trying to let Leon know I want to speak to Paul's points . . .
On 30/10/15 15:04, Greg Shatan wrote:
> Took me about 5 minutes to get an operator
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Nigel Roberts <nigel at channelisles.net
> <mailto:nigel at channelisles.net>> wrote:
>
> I've dialled in but all I get is a recorded message saying a
> co-ordinator will assist me momentarily repeated ad nauseam.
>
> On 30/10/15 14:57, Greg Shatan wrote:
>
> As Tanya requested, I've uploaded the clean version of the document
> circulated last night to Google Drive. Here is the link:
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bm0NnIq35j3-EwmBwKEjSOJia-c10wv0mhHytngTDiM/edit?usp=sharing
>
> Greg
>
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 7:15 AM, Dr. Tatiana Tropina
> <t.tropina at mpicc.de <mailto:t.tropina at mpicc.de>
> <mailto:t.tropina at mpicc.de <mailto:t.tropina at mpicc.de>>> wrote:
>
> Hi Greg,
> thanks a lot for providing this starting point for the
> rationale
> document and for pointing out that we have to proceed with
> what is
> meant to be "explanatory" document for the bylaw language.
> Would it
> be possible to share this new draft (clean version) as a
> Google doc,
> so anyone can work on it after (and during, may be) the call? I
> think Google docs were really helpful in our previous work.
> Only if
> you have time to do this, of course. Thanks a million!
> I also believe that we might consider changing the
> structure of the
> part which was meant to be the rationale document (the text
> from the
> old Google doc). I remember there were some comments and
> suggestion
> for amending/restructuring this "rationale" part in the
> Google doc
> itself and on the WP4 calls. However, this can be
> discussed during
> the call. Or any time later.
> Looking forward to the call.
> Cheers
> Tanya
>
> On 30/10/15 08:04, Greg Shatan wrote:
>
> All,
>
> As promised, here is the document I propose as the
> starting point
> for our drafting. Since the portion where I edited
> down the
> comment analysis is difficult to read in the marked
> version, I've
> also included a clean version.
>
> I look forward to our call.
>
> Greg
>
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 4:30 AM, Greg Shatan
> <gregshatanipc at gmail.com
> <mailto:gregshatanipc at gmail.com>
> <mailto:gregshatanipc at gmail.com
> <mailto:gregshatanipc at gmail.com>>> wrote:
>
> Leon and all,
>
> On point 3, I don't understand why we would be
> adding to or
> amending the Second Public Comment document. This
> document
> has now been published as part of the CCWG's
> overall review of
> the public comments. I think this document is
> pretty much closed.
>
> On the other hand, we were working on a rationale
> document in
> a Google Doc before the public comment analysis and
> then
> Dublin took over our lives. I think what we need
> to do is
> work on a document that uses as its starting point
> (i) the
> second draft report section on human rights, (ii)
> pieces of
> the rationale document, (iii) a fairly brief
> discussion/analysis of the comments and (iv) the
> new material
> provided by Leon. The ultimate goal should be to
> turn this
> into the human rights section of the next draft of the
> report. I've been working on such a document and
> should have
> a draft shortly. I won't have it as far along as
> I'd hoped,
> due to a medical emergency in my family, but
> hopefully it will
> be far enough along to give a sense of where it
> could go.
>
> Greg
>
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 3:29 AM, León Felipe
> Sánchez Ambía
> <<mailto:leonfelipe at sanchez.mx
> <mailto:leonfelipe at sanchez.mx>>leonfelipe at sanchez.mx
> <mailto:leonfelipe at sanchez.mx>
> <mailto:leonfelipe at sanchez.mx
> <mailto:leonfelipe at sanchez.mx>>> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> In anticipation for our call, I suggest the
> following agenda:
>
> 1. Welcome
> 2. Explanation by Paul Twomey on practical
> steps involved
> in changes of TLD operator (focused on ccTLD)
> 3. Review of proposed addition to our PC2 document
> 4 AOB
>
> Of course, and as usual, this agenda is a
> suggestion and
> open for amendments.
>
> Staff,
>
> Please be ready to display the document in the
> AC room.
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> León
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wp4 mailing list
> Wp4 at icann.org <mailto:Wp4 at icann.org> <mailto:Wp4 at icann.org
> <mailto:Wp4 at icann.org>>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp4
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wp4 mailing list
> Wp4 at icann.org <mailto:Wp4 at icann.org> <mailto:Wp4 at icann.org
> <mailto:Wp4 at icann.org>>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp4
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wp4 mailing list
> Wp4 at icann.org <mailto:Wp4 at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp4
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wp4 mailing list
> Wp4 at icann.org <mailto:Wp4 at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp4
>
>
More information about the Wp4
mailing list