[Wp4] Draft high level wording on Human Rights - Invitation to comment

[Greg Shatan]

>
> > . Is that now our plan?
> hope not.


On today's call, which was somewhat sparsely attended, I believe we
established that was not our plan, and we are essentially back to Plan A: a
bylaws amendment in actual bylaws language, and a rationale/framework
document.

On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 8:50 PM, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:

>
> > . Is that now our plan?
>
> hope not.
>
> avri
>
> On 02-Sep-15 20:03, Greg Shatan wrote:
> > I have added the following comment to the document:
> >
> > I had thought we were trying to draft actual bylaws language (as
> > reflected in the CCWG Proposal). This is instead a sort of Board
> > statement of support for Human Rights (variously defined by various
> > members of the WP) and statement of intention that bylaws (and
> > policies) will be developed in future (presumably in WS2. That may be
> > a better approach than amending the bylaws now, but it is certainly a
> > different one. Is that now our plan?
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Paul Twomey
> > <paul.twomey at argopacific.com <mailto:paul.twomey at argopacific.com>>
> wrote:
> >
> >     I agree that is that it should be clear - that is why I think the
> >     working through of the policies and bylaws envisaged in the draft
> >     language now will be important, but will probably take some time
> >     to avoid any unintended consequences.  There are two questions:
> >     what range or existing statement of human rights should be adopted
> >     and then to which parts of ICANN's operations etc do they apply.
> >
> >
> >     On 9/3/15 1:21 AM, Nigel Roberts wrote:
> >
> >         I think I also said earlier that I totally agree that ICANN's
> >         obligations in this regard be limited to what it does within
> >         its mission.
> >
> >         So we are on the same page there.
> >
> >         I do however insist on knowing WHICH fundamental rights ICANN
> >         are signed up to respect.
> >
> >             Hence my suggestion that we be clear that human rights be
> >             limited only
> >             to ICANN's own ways of conducting its work within its
> mission.
> >
> >         _______________________________________________
> >         Wp4 mailing list
> >         Wp4 at icann.org <mailto:Wp4 at icann.org>
> >         https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp4
> >
> >
> >     --
> >     Dr Paul Twomey
> >     Managing Director
> >     Argo P at cific
> >
> >     US Cell: +1 310 279 2366 <tel:%2B1%20310%20279%202366>
> >     Aust M: +61 416 238 501 <tel:%2B61%20416%20238%20501>
> >
> >     www.argopacific.com <http://www.argopacific.com>
> >
> >     _______________________________________________
> >     Wp4 mailing list
> >     Wp4 at icann.org <mailto:Wp4 at icann.org>
> >     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp4
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wp4 mailing list
> > Wp4 at icann.org
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp4
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wp4 mailing list
> Wp4 at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp4
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wp4/attachments/20150902/27e2e4e2/attachment.html>