[Wp4] Draft high level wording on Human Rights - Invitation to comment

Thu Sep 3 04:57:12 UTC 2015

That is the plan

Saludos,

León

Enviado desde el móvil. Disculpa brevedad y errores tipográficos. 

El sept 2, 2015, a las 8:04 PM, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com> escribió:

>> > . Is that now our plan?
>> hope not.
> 
> On today's call, which was somewhat sparsely attended, I believe we established that was not our plan, and we are essentially back to Plan A: a bylaws amendment in actual bylaws language, and a rationale/framework document.  
> 
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 8:50 PM, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:
>> 
>> > . Is that now our plan?
>> 
>> hope not.
>> 
>> avri
>> 
>> On 02-Sep-15 20:03, Greg Shatan wrote:
>> > I have added the following comment to the document:
>> >
>> > I had thought we were trying to draft actual bylaws language (as
>> > reflected in the CCWG Proposal). This is instead a sort of Board
>> > statement of support for Human Rights (variously defined by various
>> > members of the WP) and statement of intention that bylaws (and
>> > policies) will be developed in future (presumably in WS2. That may be
>> > a better approach than amending the bylaws now, but it is certainly a
>> > different one. Is that now our plan?
>> >
>> > On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Paul Twomey
>> > <paul.twomey at argopacific.com <mailto:paul.twomey at argopacific.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> >     I agree that is that it should be clear - that is why I think the
>> >     working through of the policies and bylaws envisaged in the draft
>> >     language now will be important, but will probably take some time
>> >     to avoid any unintended consequences.  There are two questions:
>> >     what range or existing statement of human rights should be adopted
>> >     and then to which parts of ICANN's operations etc do they apply.
>> >
>> >
>> >     On 9/3/15 1:21 AM, Nigel Roberts wrote:
>> >
>> >         I think I also said earlier that I totally agree that ICANN's
>> >         obligations in this regard be limited to what it does within
>> >         its mission.
>> >
>> >         So we are on the same page there.
>> >
>> >         I do however insist on knowing WHICH fundamental rights ICANN
>> >         are signed up to respect.
>> >
>> >             Hence my suggestion that we be clear that human rights be
>> >             limited only
>> >             to ICANN's own ways of conducting its work within its mission.
>> >
>> >         _______________________________________________
>> >         Wp4 mailing list
>> >         Wp4 at icann.org <mailto:Wp4 at icann.org>
>> >         https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp4
>> >
>> >
>> >     --
>> >     Dr Paul Twomey
>> >     Managing Director
>> >     Argo P at cific
>> >
>> >     US Cell: +1 310 279 2366 <tel:%2B1%20310%20279%202366>
>> >     Aust M: +61 416 238 501 <tel:%2B61%20416%20238%20501>
>> >
>> >     www.argopacific.com <http://www.argopacific.com>
>> >
>> >     _______________________________________________
>> >     Wp4 mailing list
>> >     Wp4 at icann.org <mailto:Wp4 at icann.org>
>> >     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp4
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Wp4 mailing list
>> > Wp4 at icann.org
>> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp4
>> 
>> 
>> ---
>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wp4 mailing list
>> Wp4 at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp4
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Wp4 mailing list
> Wp4 at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp4
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wp4/attachments/20150902/37e611b4/attachment-0001.html>