[Wp4] Human Rights Briefing and Discussion paper.docx - Invitation to comment

[Greg Shatan]

Matthew,

The reason I did not do that is that I didn't really see anything
particularly useful in that first document in terms of preparing a
foundational/framework/explanatory/rationale document.  It seemed to be a
mix of process summary and proclamation, neither of which were particularly
on point.

Also since these started out as two different documents, I kept the
distinction.

That said, this is in itself a process question.  So, if people want to
combine the documents, that's not a particular problem.  Either way, we are
at a starting point.

Greg

On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 4:42 AM, Matthew Shears <mshears at cdt.org> wrote:

> Hi
>
> The only thing is we now seem to have two Google docs.  This is the one
> with the high level "statement" that already has comments in it:
>
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/15t32Y7DyzGCAR21XT9koN9y2hNK_nAifuNZGwaFfnlQ/edit
>
> I would suggest that we add the text from the new google doc below into
> the one above so that we are working off one document.
>
> Thanks.
>
> On 9/7/2015 8:42 AM, Nigel Roberts wrote:
>
>> Greg
>>
>> Thanks for doing this.
>>
>> As you correctly say, this is a starting point.
>>
>> And the point of a starting point is that you need to start.
>>
>> Rehearsing Dr Lisse once more: I regret that, I have a day job.
>>
>> It's a reason -- but not an excuse -- for the fact I didn't do this yet.
>> But also, I didn't wish to opine in a vacuum, so I find it really helpful
>> to have the impetus of at least one person to engage with.
>>
>> I think that given the recent pushback from the ICANN-the-corporation
>> (i.e. the Board-staff axis) against the work of the accountability WG, that
>> getting a commitment to incorporate a comittment to uphold H/F rights
>> within ICANN's mission, is now not only important, but essential to
>> permitting ICANN's to be released from NTIA's long dog-leash.
>>
>>
>> On 07/09/15 04:59, Greg Shatan (via Google Docs) wrote:
>>
>>> Greg Shatan <mailto:gregshatanipc at gmail.com> has invited you to *comment
>>> on* the following document:
>>> Human Rights Briefing and Discussion paper.docx
>>> <
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1h36fvBBwR40Eu87XPHN6Yxoz3zFkTZ7ZreYG0kymSOY/edit?usp=sharing_eid&invite=COLfq84E>
>>>
>>> Sender's profile photoAll,
>>>
>>> As mentioned on our last call, I've copied Nigel's initial starting
>>> point for a framework or "briefing paper" related to a proposed Human
>>> Rights bylaw amendment. At this point, I've made no changes to Nigel's
>>> draft other than formatting. We should all feel free to add to this,
>>> including by taking some of the useful dialogue in prior emails and
>>> adding it to the document. I will try to do this shortly, but wanted to
>>> get this out without further ado.
>>>
>>> Greg
>>> Open in Docs
>>> <
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1h36fvBBwR40Eu87XPHN6Yxoz3zFkTZ7ZreYG0kymSOY/edit?usp=sharing_eid&invite=COLfq84E>
>>>
>>> This email grants access to this item without logging in. Only forward
>>> it to people you trust.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Google Docs: Create and edit documents online.    Logo for Google Docs
>>> <https://drive.google.com>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wp4 mailing list
>>> Wp4 at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp4
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>> Wp4 mailing list
>> Wp4 at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp4
>>
>
> --
> Matthew Shears
> Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
> Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)
> + 44 (0)771 247 2987
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wp4 mailing list
> Wp4 at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/wp4
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/wp4/attachments/20150907/1f9d948a/attachment.html>