[Ws2-hr] Concerns and summary documents

[Dr. Tatiana Tropina]

Anne, thanks a lot for your email.

I suggest to the group that those who work on the google documents will
kindly avoid deleting the whole pieces of the text suggested by others
without at least pointing why it has been deleted. I was really
surprised when I found that my short brainstorming starting points -
that I put as suggestions to the google doc - were rejected by someone
with no explanation and the document was left empty (as far as I am
aware it wasn't anyone from those listed as the team who is going to
lead the drafting process of the WS1 summary). I had to restore my
content and instead of "suggesting" mode to just edit the doc and write
a note. Sorry if the note looks a bit harsh, but I think it is better to
remind everyone about these (previously unwritten) rules :)

We have not got such a problem before, I assume we just have to remind
all the newcomers to this DT of CCWG that in process of drafting we
don't delete the big pieces of text in google documents when they are
written by others without explaining why and/or proposing amendments. We
successfully used google docs in CCWG WP4 on human rights in the
workstream 1 as a tool for drafting the proposed text of the bylaw and
the explanatory note to the bylaw for the CCWG report. I hope we will
continue using this collaborative tool in the same open and inclusive
manner.

Warm regards

Tatiana


On 16/08/16 23:55, Aikman-Scalese, Anne wrote:
> I think Tatiana's note points up another problem with using Google docs.  She says someone unilaterally deleted her entries.
>
> Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
> Of Counsel
> 520.629.4428 office
> 520.879.4725 fax
> AAikman at lrrc.com
> _______________________________
>
> Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP
> One South Church Avenue, Suite 700
> Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
> lrrc.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ws2-hr-bounces at icann.org [mailto:ws2-hr-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Niels ten Oever
> Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 1:05 PM
> To: ws2-hr at icann.org
> Subject: [Ws2-hr] Concerns and summary documents
>
> Dear all,
>
> Thanks you very much for the productive and constructive first call of the CCWG WS2 DT HR, as agreed, please find underneath two empty good docs for the agreed tasks:
>
> Concerns on possible impacts of Human Rights bylaw and FoI
> - lead by Paul Twomey and Tatian Tropina https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KcKGRJjuhKEzCh2AZ8PPR_MofOQFBN8CMuJqTG_h9h4/edit?usp=sharing
>
> Summary on what was agreed and discussed on human rights duringWS1
> - lead by Greg Shatan, Tatiana Tropina, David McAuley, Niels ten Oever https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rwpw9aSAqboRO2_rNkjMVJPOmYwmdr5B1_M_aNMoZb4/edit?usp=sharing
>
> All the best,
>
> Niels
>
> --
> Niels ten Oever
> Head of Digital
>
> Article 19
> www.article19.org
>
> PGP fingerprint    8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4
>                    678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9 _______________________________________________
> Ws2-hr mailing list
> Ws2-hr at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
> _______________________________________________
> Ws2-hr mailing list
> Ws2-hr at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr