[Ws2-hr] Concerns and summary documents

Tue Aug 23 18:48:49 UTC 2016

Hi Tatiana,

I think we can resolve the problem by 1) ask the owner of the gdoc to set
the document in comment mode. This way, the edits will be automatically
marked as suggestions, and the changes to the document can be tracked to
the owner ( sometimes the changes are done by anonymous, but you can still
see what changes have been made).

At the moment the gdoc is in edit mode so you cannot track the changes. And
some forget or don't know they should change the mode to suggestion mode.

2) we could also agree to instead of deleting the text, comment on it and
 recommend deleting it .

We can perhaps discuss this during the call.

Best

Farzaneh

On 17 August 2016 at 00:16, Dr. Tatiana Tropina <t.tropina at mpicc.de> wrote:

> Anne, thanks a lot for your email.
>
> I suggest to the group that those who work on the google documents will
> kindly avoid deleting the whole pieces of the text suggested by others
> without at least pointing why it has been deleted. I was really
> surprised when I found that my short brainstorming starting points -
> that I put as suggestions to the google doc - were rejected by someone
> with no explanation and the document was left empty (as far as I am
> aware it wasn't anyone from those listed as the team who is going to
> lead the drafting process of the WS1 summary). I had to restore my
> content and instead of "suggesting" mode to just edit the doc and write
> a note. Sorry if the note looks a bit harsh, but I think it is better to
> remind everyone about these (previously unwritten) rules :)
>
> We have not got such a problem before, I assume we just have to remind
> all the newcomers to this DT of CCWG that in process of drafting we
> don't delete the big pieces of text in google documents when they are
> written by others without explaining why and/or proposing amendments. We
> successfully used google docs in CCWG WP4 on human rights in the
> workstream 1 as a tool for drafting the proposed text of the bylaw and
> the explanatory note to the bylaw for the CCWG report. I hope we will
> continue using this collaborative tool in the same open and inclusive
> manner.
>
> Warm regards
>
> Tatiana
>
>
> On 16/08/16 23:55, Aikman-Scalese, Anne wrote:
> > I think Tatiana's note points up another problem with using Google
> docs.  She says someone unilaterally deleted her entries.
> >
> > Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
> > Of Counsel
> > 520.629.4428 office
> > 520.879.4725 fax
> > AAikman at lrrc.com
> > _______________________________
> >
> > Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP
> > One South Church Avenue, Suite 700
> > Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
> > lrrc.com
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ws2-hr-bounces at icann.org [mailto:ws2-hr-bounces at icann.org] On
> Behalf Of Niels ten Oever
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 1:05 PM
> > To: ws2-hr at icann.org
> > Subject: [Ws2-hr] Concerns and summary documents
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > Thanks you very much for the productive and constructive first call of
> the CCWG WS2 DT HR, as agreed, please find underneath two empty good docs
> for the agreed tasks:
> >
> > Concerns on possible impacts of Human Rights bylaw and FoI
> > - lead by Paul Twomey and Tatian Tropina https://docs.google.com/
> document/d/1KcKGRJjuhKEzCh2AZ8PPR_MofOQFBN8CMuJqTG_h9h4/edit?usp=sharing
> >
> > Summary on what was agreed and discussed on human rights duringWS1
> > - lead by Greg Shatan, Tatiana Tropina, David McAuley, Niels ten Oever
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rwpw9aSAqboRO2_
> rNkjMVJPOmYwmdr5B1_M_aNMoZb4/edit?usp=sharing
> >
> > All the best,
> >
> > Niels
> >
> > --
> > Niels ten Oever
> > Head of Digital
> >
> > Article 19
> > www.article19.org
> >
> > PGP fingerprint    8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4
> >                    678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
> _______________________________________________
> > Ws2-hr mailing list
> > Ws2-hr at icann.org
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> > This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this
> message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or
> agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended
> recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
> copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you
> have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
> replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any
> attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and
> confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the
> Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ws2-hr mailing list
> > Ws2-hr at icann.org
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ws2-hr mailing list
> Ws2-hr at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr
>

-- 
Farzaneh
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-hr/attachments/20160823/380dab34/attachment.html>