[Ws2-hr] New Draft Text for FoI

[Rudolph Daniel]

Niels
Thank you, this is very useful indeed. Since you mentioned Ruggie, I wonder
what his response might be to expressed concerns.
With regard to due diligence, I'm not clear if icann already has a process
that triggers a due diligence process with regards to human rights per se.
rd

On Oct 3, 2016 11:07 AM, "Niels ten Oever" <lists at nielstenoever.net> wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> I hope this e-mail finds you well. To ensure nothing of our constructive
> discussions is getting lost, and to help us continue to be very
> concrete, I would like to share with you the attached document, that can
> also be found here (page 2 onwards):
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1emqmzyB9_
> 0vm6oKxhIWZ47L7lxcFKUBHVnkBYUOsA2Q/edit
>
> The document aims to represent a sedimentation of our discussion and
> suggest a way forward, by providing potential text for the Framework of
> Interpretation. Partially inspired by the reaction of John Ruggie when I
> brought up our concerns with him.
>
> I hope this proves to be useful, and I am more than happy to discuss it
> with you all on the list and the call, and of course work on suggestions
> and comments in the Google Doc.
>
> Best,
>
> Niels
>
>
> --
> Niels ten Oever
> Head of Digital
>
> Article 19
> www.article19.org
>
> PGP fingerprint    8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4
>                    678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ws2-hr mailing list
> Ws2-hr at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-hr/attachments/20161003/4a253365/attachment.html>