[Ws2-hr] When should ICANN uphold human rights?

[Arasteh]

ICANN Mission including whether it can regulate the content was extensively discussed, debated and finally agreed with serious difficulties and then approved by the entire CCWG . Then it was further discussed by legal Team and submitted to ICANN Board and agreed and then published as an integral part of new Bylaws.
Are you suggesting that this dub group with mutual accountability responsibility modifies the Bylaws?!!
It is outside the term of reference of this subgroup as well as that of CCWG WS2.
The question you did raise had nothing to do with " content regulation"
If you do not want ti consult your 
 Co- chair and declare total independence, that is another issue
Please reformulate your question to be clearly understood
Regard
Kavouss     
> On 4 Sep 2016, at 17:55, farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Calling something "not meaningful" is very easy. But it does not devalue its merits, fortunately.  Please provide a rationale for why the questions are not meaningful. I don't have to consult with the co-chairs to discuss the questions here. If the group feels that it is unnecessary to discuss these questions they can simply not respond, if they feel we should re-formulate them, then we can. 
> 
> The questions are to clarify what we mean by ICANN should not become a content regulator. The discussions that can arise responding to the question and sub-questions which I have posted can lead us towards a more tangible understanding of what we mean when we say ICANN should not become a content regulator and should not go out of its scope and mission when upholding human rights. 
> 
> Best
> 
> Farzaneh 
> 
>> On 4 September 2016 at 17:34, Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Dear All,
>> I do not understand the meaning and purpose of these questions.
>> Perhaps the author of the questions could consult other two co chairs and come up with meaningfull text.
>> We can not send out these questions at all
>> Reagrds
>> Kavouss
>> 
>> 2016-09-04 14:25 GMT+02:00 farzaneh badii <farzaneh.badii at gmail.com>:
>>> Hi all, 
>>> 
>>> Sorry for sending out the questions late. I wanted to provide a gist of what we discussed during our call and then provide the questions but unfortunately, we still do not have the recording. Below are some questions for the group to discuss:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Considering ICANN's scope and mission, when should ICANN uphold human rights?
>>> 
>>> - In its consideration to enter into contracts with registries and registrars? (for example, when they are considering a new gTLD application) 
>>> 
>>> - During the contractual relationship with the registries and the registrars by obligating the registries and registrars to enforce human rights?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Best 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Farzaneh
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ws2-hr mailing list
>>> Ws2-hr at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Farzaneh
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-hr/attachments/20160904/1a9fd67c/attachment.html>