[Ws2-hr] Outcomes of todays call

[Niels ten Oever]

Thanks Jorge.

The original text to which you objected was:

The group feels the current proposed wording is a balanced
consensus between the different opinions held in the ICANN community,
particularly concerning the remit of ICANN’s Mission.

The text that was then adapted (also based on your comments) and which
was discussed in the call was:

The conclusion of the Subgroup is that the current proposed wording is a
careful balance between the different opinions held in the ICANN
community, particularly considering the remit of ICANN’s Mission.

The text you propose is:

The group feels the current proposed wording is a minimum common
denominator text between the different opinions held in the ICANN community.

Let's hear what other on the list think about this proposed text.

Best,

Niels

On 08/23/2017 01:18 PM, Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch wrote:
> As to how you presented *my alternative* text to paragraph 5 of the
> draft message to the CCWG /(//" The group feels the current proposed
> wording is a minimum common denominator text between the different
> opinions held in the ICANN community./”, see in my Emails sent on August
> 16^th to the list and sent again yesterday before the call)the "adobe
> call replay" shows that _it was not mentioned and therefore not handled
> as an alternative_.

-- 
Niels ten Oever
Head of Digital

Article 19
www.article19.org

PGP fingerprint    8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4
                   678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9