[Ws2-hr] Proposed Agenda FIRST READING considerations document Feb 28 19:00 UTC
Kavouss Arasteh
kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
Tue Feb 28 18:36:16 UTC 2017
Dear Niels,
I understand that the question referring to GAC Advice then pls add the
same text to the Policy development under GNSO and CCNSO by replacing GAC
by these two entities.
I have proposed that version earlier but you did not consider it.
What I wish is to treat all entities providing Recommendations and Advice
EQUALY.
Some GNSO, IPC, ccNSO participants pushing to marginalize GAC again.
Pls kindly understand the problem
Regards
Kavouss
2017-02-28 12:38 GMT+01:00 Niels ten Oever <lists at nielstenoever.net>:
> Dear Kavouss,
>
> On 02/28/2017 10:03 AM, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
> > Dear Niels,
> > Thank you very much for the file.
> > I still have serious difficulties to treat GNSO and ccNSO
> > Recommendations from GAC Advice. Unless all three are not treated
> > equally , I would continue to object to the texts proposed.
>
> The consideration is responding to a direct question about the GAC, that
> is why only GAC is explicitly mentioned there.
>
>
> > I also have problem with the term " HUMAN RIGHTS BYLAW as there is no
> > Bylaw for human rights .Perhaps we should say Human Rights mentioned in
> > Bylaw.
>
> OK, I propose that we consistently use Human Rights Core Value, so that
> there will be no confusion about what is meant.
>
> > I therefore attaching my comments in a revised version of the doc.,
>
> Thanks,
>
> Niels
>
> > Regards
> > Kavouss
> >
> >
> > 2017-02-28 8:26 GMT+01:00 <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch
> > <mailto:Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch>>:
> >
> > Dear Niels and all____
> >
> > __ __
> >
> > Further to the comment below, please find attached a version of the
> > document with further suggestions and comments/questions (which I
> > have also included in the Google Doc).____
> >
> > __ __
> >
> > It is unfortunate that I can no longer attend the meetings as they
> > always are at the same time and at least in Europe fall in the
> > evening, where other commitments and obligations of a different
> > nature are due. Maybe we could reconsider the non-rotation of the
> > meetings…____
> >
> > __ __
> >
> > Nonetheless, I hope that these comments may be taken on board during
> > today’s call. ____
> >
> > __ __
> >
> > @staff: please mention my comments during the call, as if I was
> > there J____
> >
> > __ __
> >
> > Kind regards____
> >
> > __ __
> >
> > Jorge ____
> >
> > __ __
> >
> > __ __
> >
> > __ __
> >
> > *Von:*Cancio Jorge BAKOM
> > *Gesendet:* Dienstag, 28. Februar 2017 06:38
> > *An:* Niels ten Oever <lists at nielstenoever.net
> > <mailto:lists at nielstenoever.net>>; ws2-hr at icann.org
> > <mailto:ws2-hr at icann.org>
> > *Betreff:* AW: [Ws2-hr] Proposed Agenda FIRST READING considerations
> > document Feb 28 19:00 UTC____
> >
> > __ __
> >
> > Dear Niels____
> >
> > __ __
> >
> > While I will not be able to attend the call this evening, I disagree
> > with the wording of this sentence:____
> >
> > __ __
> >
> > "However, there was not sufficient support to recommend the
> > application of the UN Guiding Principles for the /interpretation /of
> > the Bylaw."____
> >
> > __ __
> >
> > The WG did not reach consensus or did not reach agreement - which is
> > the way we worked. Saying that "there was not sufficient support"
> > mischaracterizes the way we work(ed) and may imply that there was
> > some sort of voting, which was not the case.____
> >
> > __ __
> >
> > Therefore I would propose the following text:____
> >
> > __ __
> >
> > "However, there was no agreement on whether to recommend the
> > application of the UN Guiding Principles for the /interpretation /of
> > the Bylaw."____
> >
> > __ __
> >
> > Hope you may take this on board.____
> >
> > __ __
> >
> > regards____
> >
> > __ __
> >
> > Jorge____
> >
> > __ __
> >
> > __ __
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------
> >
> >
> > *Von:* Niels ten Oever <lists at nielstenoever.net
> > <mailto:lists at nielstenoever.net>>
> > *Datum:* 28. Februar 2017 um 01:16:01 MEZ
> > *An:* ws2-hr at icann.org <mailto:ws2-hr at icann.org><ws2-hr at icann.org
> > <mailto:ws2-hr at icann.org>>
> > *Betreff:* [Ws2-hr] Proposed Agenda FIRST READING considerations
> > document Feb 28 19:00 UTC____
> >
> > __ __
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > It is with great pleasure that I can share with you the draft agenda
> for
> > the meeting of February 28, 19:00 UTC.
> >
> > The drafting group worked hard after the constructive session last
> week.
> > With this document we might have arrived at a new milestone.
> >
> > I am very much looking forward to have a first reading of the
> > Considerations document with you in the call. As previously
> discussed,
> > the Consideration document will be merged into one document with the
> FoI
> > upon approval by the subgroup.
> >
> > I am greatly looking forward to discuss this with you on the call.
> >
> > Please find the proposed agenda underneath and attached, as well as
> the
> > document.
> >
> > 1. Administrivia
> > Roll call, absentees, SoIs, etc
> > 2. First reading (of two) of the Considerations document prepared by
> the
> > drafting team
> > 3. AOB
> >
> > The document can also be found here:
> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KJfmglI5wBib7T5hgIMMysO7x6J3O
> i5NYwN4AItZjkY/edit
> > <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KJfmglI5wBib7T5hgIMMysO7x6J3O
> i5NYwN4AItZjkY/edit>
> >
> > Please let me know if you have any question or suggestions.
> >
> > All the best,
> >
> > Niels
> > --
> > Niels ten Oever
> > Head of Digital
> >
> > Article 19
> > www.article19.org <http://www.article19.org>
> >
> > PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4
> > 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9____
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ws2-hr mailing list
> > Ws2-hr at icann.org <mailto:Ws2-hr at icann.org>
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr
> > <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr>
> >
> >
>
> --
> Niels ten Oever
> Head of Digital
>
> Article 19
> www.article19.org
>
> PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4
> 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-hr/attachments/20170228/d8ff3c6f/attachment.html>
More information about the Ws2-hr
mailing list