[Ws2-hr] Proposed Agenda FIRST READING considerations document Feb 28 19:00 UTC
Niels ten Oever
lists at nielstenoever.net
Tue Feb 28 11:38:49 UTC 2017
Dear Kavouss,
On 02/28/2017 10:03 AM, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
> Dear Niels,
> Thank you very much for the file.
> I still have serious difficulties to treat GNSO and ccNSO
> Recommendations from GAC Advice. Unless all three are not treated
> equally , I would continue to object to the texts proposed.
The consideration is responding to a direct question about the GAC, that
is why only GAC is explicitly mentioned there.
> I also have problem with the term " HUMAN RIGHTS BYLAW as there is no
> Bylaw for human rights .Perhaps we should say Human Rights mentioned in
> Bylaw.
OK, I propose that we consistently use Human Rights Core Value, so that
there will be no confusion about what is meant.
> I therefore attaching my comments in a revised version of the doc.,
Thanks,
Niels
> Regards
> Kavouss
>
>
> 2017-02-28 8:26 GMT+01:00 <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch
> <mailto:Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch>>:
>
> Dear Niels and all____
>
> __ __
>
> Further to the comment below, please find attached a version of the
> document with further suggestions and comments/questions (which I
> have also included in the Google Doc).____
>
> __ __
>
> It is unfortunate that I can no longer attend the meetings as they
> always are at the same time and at least in Europe fall in the
> evening, where other commitments and obligations of a different
> nature are due. Maybe we could reconsider the non-rotation of the
> meetings…____
>
> __ __
>
> Nonetheless, I hope that these comments may be taken on board during
> today’s call. ____
>
> __ __
>
> @staff: please mention my comments during the call, as if I was
> there J____
>
> __ __
>
> Kind regards____
>
> __ __
>
> Jorge ____
>
> __ __
>
> __ __
>
> __ __
>
> *Von:*Cancio Jorge BAKOM
> *Gesendet:* Dienstag, 28. Februar 2017 06:38
> *An:* Niels ten Oever <lists at nielstenoever.net
> <mailto:lists at nielstenoever.net>>; ws2-hr at icann.org
> <mailto:ws2-hr at icann.org>
> *Betreff:* AW: [Ws2-hr] Proposed Agenda FIRST READING considerations
> document Feb 28 19:00 UTC____
>
> __ __
>
> Dear Niels____
>
> __ __
>
> While I will not be able to attend the call this evening, I disagree
> with the wording of this sentence:____
>
> __ __
>
> "However, there was not sufficient support to recommend the
> application of the UN Guiding Principles for the /interpretation /of
> the Bylaw."____
>
> __ __
>
> The WG did not reach consensus or did not reach agreement - which is
> the way we worked. Saying that "there was not sufficient support"
> mischaracterizes the way we work(ed) and may imply that there was
> some sort of voting, which was not the case.____
>
> __ __
>
> Therefore I would propose the following text:____
>
> __ __
>
> "However, there was no agreement on whether to recommend the
> application of the UN Guiding Principles for the /interpretation /of
> the Bylaw."____
>
> __ __
>
> Hope you may take this on board.____
>
> __ __
>
> regards____
>
> __ __
>
> Jorge____
>
> __ __
>
> __ __
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> *Von:* Niels ten Oever <lists at nielstenoever.net
> <mailto:lists at nielstenoever.net>>
> *Datum:* 28. Februar 2017 um 01:16:01 MEZ
> *An:* ws2-hr at icann.org <mailto:ws2-hr at icann.org><ws2-hr at icann.org
> <mailto:ws2-hr at icann.org>>
> *Betreff:* [Ws2-hr] Proposed Agenda FIRST READING considerations
> document Feb 28 19:00 UTC____
>
> __ __
>
> Dear all,
>
> It is with great pleasure that I can share with you the draft agenda for
> the meeting of February 28, 19:00 UTC.
>
> The drafting group worked hard after the constructive session last week.
> With this document we might have arrived at a new milestone.
>
> I am very much looking forward to have a first reading of the
> Considerations document with you in the call. As previously discussed,
> the Consideration document will be merged into one document with the FoI
> upon approval by the subgroup.
>
> I am greatly looking forward to discuss this with you on the call.
>
> Please find the proposed agenda underneath and attached, as well as the
> document.
>
> 1. Administrivia
> Roll call, absentees, SoIs, etc
> 2. First reading (of two) of the Considerations document prepared by the
> drafting team
> 3. AOB
>
> The document can also be found here:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KJfmglI5wBib7T5hgIMMysO7x6J3Oi5NYwN4AItZjkY/edit
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KJfmglI5wBib7T5hgIMMysO7x6J3Oi5NYwN4AItZjkY/edit>
>
> Please let me know if you have any question or suggestions.
>
> All the best,
>
> Niels
> --
> Niels ten Oever
> Head of Digital
>
> Article 19
> www.article19.org <http://www.article19.org>
>
> PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4
> 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9____
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ws2-hr mailing list
> Ws2-hr at icann.org <mailto:Ws2-hr at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr
> <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr>
>
>
--
Niels ten Oever
Head of Digital
Article 19
www.article19.org
PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4
678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
More information about the Ws2-hr
mailing list