[Ws2-hr] Proposed Agenda FIRST READING considerations document Feb 28 19:00 UTC

[Kavouss Arasteh]

Dear Niels,
Thank you very much for the file.
I still have serious difficulties to treat  GNSO and ccNSO  Recommendations
from  GAC Advice. Unless all three are not treated equally , I would
continue to object to the texts proposed.
I also have problem with the term " HUMAN RIGHTS BYLAW as there is no Bylaw
for human rights .Perhaps we should say Human Rights mentioned in Bylaw.
I therefore attaching my comments in a revised version of the doc.,
Regards
Kavouss


2017-02-28 8:26 GMT+01:00 <Jorge.Cancio at bakom.admin.ch>:

> Dear Niels and all
>
>
>
> Further to the comment below, please find attached a version of the
> document with further suggestions and comments/questions (which I have also
> included in the Google Doc).
>
>
>
> It is unfortunate that I can no longer attend the meetings as they always
> are at the same time and at least in Europe fall in the evening, where
> other commitments and obligations of a different nature are due. Maybe we
> could reconsider the non-rotation of the meetings…
>
>
>
> Nonetheless, I hope that these comments may be taken on board during
> today’s call.
>
>
>
> @staff: please mention my comments during the call, as if I was there J
>
>
>
> Kind regards
>
>
>
> Jorge
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *Von:* Cancio Jorge BAKOM
> *Gesendet:* Dienstag, 28. Februar 2017 06:38
> *An:* Niels ten Oever <lists at nielstenoever.net>; ws2-hr at icann.org
> *Betreff:* AW: [Ws2-hr] Proposed Agenda FIRST READING considerations
> document Feb 28 19:00 UTC
>
>
>
> Dear Niels
>
>
>
> While I will not be able to attend the call this evening, I disagree with
> the wording of this sentence:
>
>
>
> "However, there was not sufficient support to recommend the application
> of the UN Guiding Principles for the *interpretation *of the Bylaw."
>
>
>
> The WG did not reach consensus or did not reach agreement - which is the
> way we worked. Saying that "there was not sufficient support"
> mischaracterizes the way we work(ed) and may imply that there was some sort
> of voting, which was not the case.
>
>
>
> Therefore I would propose the following text:
>
>
>
> "However, there was no agreement on whether to recommend the application
> of the UN Guiding Principles for the *interpretation *of the Bylaw."
>
>
>
> Hope you may take this on board.
>
>
>
> regards
>
>
>
> Jorge
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
> *Von:* Niels ten Oever <lists at nielstenoever.net>
> *Datum:* 28. Februar 2017 um 01:16:01 MEZ
> *An:* ws2-hr at icann.org <ws2-hr at icann.org>
> *Betreff:* [Ws2-hr] Proposed Agenda FIRST READING considerations document
> Feb 28 19:00 UTC
>
>
>
> Dear all,
>
> It is with great pleasure that I can share with you the draft agenda for
> the meeting of February 28, 19:00 UTC.
>
> The drafting group worked hard after the constructive session last week.
> With this document we might have arrived at a new milestone.
>
> I am very much looking forward to have a first reading of the
> Considerations document with you in the call. As previously discussed,
> the Consideration document will be merged into one document with the FoI
> upon approval by the subgroup.
>
> I am greatly looking forward to discuss this with you on the call.
>
> Please find the proposed agenda underneath and attached, as well as the
> document.
>
> 1. Administrivia
> Roll call, absentees, SoIs, etc
> 2. First reading (of two) of the Considerations document prepared by the
> drafting team
> 3. AOB
>
> The document can also be found here:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KJfmglI5wBib7T5hgIMMysO7x6J3O
> i5NYwN4AItZjkY/edit
>
> Please let me know if you have any question or suggestions.
>
> All the best,
>
> Niels
> --
> Niels ten Oever
> Head of Digital
>
> Article 19
> www.article19.org
>
> PGP fingerprint    8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4
>                    678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ws2-hr mailing list
> Ws2-hr at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-hr/attachments/20170228/ea371d6a/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Revised doc. by Kavouss.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 21465 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-hr/attachments/20170228/ea371d6a/Reviseddoc.byKavouss-0001.docx>