[Ws2-hr] Fwd: Input from SSAC to the WG on Human Rights

Tue Mar 14 08:06:13 UTC 2017

Thank you Niels.  I am planning to attend this session.  I spoke with Patrik last night.  His explanation was a bit different in terms of the limited scope of ICANN's mission.  Tatiana also heard this explanation and may have comment.  However, Patrik emphasized that someone from SSAC would be present at the NCSG meeting on Human Rights mentioned to explain the SSAC letter and why it comes before an FOI being published by the CCWG-Accountability.

Anne

Anne E. Aikman-Scalese
Of Counsel
520.629.4428 office
520.879.4725 fax
AAikman at lrrc.com
_______________________________

Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP
One South Church Avenue, Suite 700
Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611
lrrc.com
-----Original Message-----
From: ws2-hr-bounces at icann.org [mailto:ws2-hr-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Niels ten Oever
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2017 8:12 AM
To: Paul Twomey
Cc: ws2-hr at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Ws2-hr] Fwd: Input from SSAC to the WG on Human Rights

Hi Paul,

As far as I know ICANN does not have contracts with ccTLDs, right?

In any case, I would like to invite everyone to a session of the CCWP HR * coming Wednesday March 15 at 17:00 (CEST) ** where both SSAC and an expert on Human Rights Impact Assessment from the Danish Institute for Human Rights will be present, so that might be an interesting venue to discuss.

Best,

Niels

* Cross Community Working Party on ICANNs Corporate and Social Responsibility to Respect Human Right
** https://schedule.icann.org/event/9nmu/gnso-ncsg-icann-human-rights

On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 10:43:14AM -0400, Paul Twomey wrote:
> Yes Neil.   But think of how does ICANN do a Human Rights Impact Assessment
> on an agreement with a new ccTLD operator in a non-democratic (or even
> democratic) country?    ICANN is not the UN Human Rights Council.   It would
> be explosive.
>
>
> On 3/13/17 10:38 AM, Niels ten Oever wrote:
> > Hi Paul,
> >
> > Thanks for your response. Reply inline:
> >
> > On 03/13/2017 03:32 PM, Paul Twomey wrote:
> > > Dear Niels
> > >
> > > I note the SSAC report.   I worry again that its recommendation language
> > > calling for a Human Rights Impact Assessment,
> > >
> > > Microsoft Word -
> > > SAC0XX_SSAC_Input_to_CCWG-Acc_WS2_Human_Rights_v1.1-CLEAN.docx
> > >
> > > "A Human Rights Impact Assessment4 is a process for systematically
> > > identifying, predicting and responding to the potential human
> > > rights impacts of business operations, policies, or agreements."
> > >
> > > has the possible consequence of inadvertantly trying to impose
> > > human rights tests on agreements in the IANA function, especially as they may
> > > apply to agreements (written or explicit) with ccTLD operators.   As I
> > > have said consistently in this process, this could be extremely damaging
> > > on the operations and global acceptance of the IANA function.   Hence my
> > > concern about certain sections of the Ruggie Principles being
> > > applied to ICANN - ICANN does not have the luxury of choosing
> > > which parts of the world it may or may not serve.
> > >
> > > First and foremost, the first right of humans we need to protect
> > > is having access to an Internet that is global and operates 7x24.
> > >
> > Isn't that exactly what the SSAC letter says in the first paragraph
> > (as well as the Core Value, and the Framework of Interpretation) ?
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Niels
> >
> >
> > > Best
> > >
> > > Paul
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 3/13/17 9:12 AM, Niels ten Oever wrote:
> > > > Dear all,
> > > >
> > > > Please find attached the letter we received from SSAC.
> > > >
> > > > All the best,
> > > >
> > > > Niels
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -------- Forwarded Message --------
> > > > Subject: Input from SSAC to the WG on Human Rights
> > > > Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2017 03:12:11 +0100
> > > > From: Patrik Fältström <paf at netnod.se>
> > > > To: Niels ten Oever <niels at article19.org>
> > > > CC: SSAC <ssac at icann.org>, Human Rights
> > > > <cc-humanrights at icann.org>
> > > >
> > > > Niels,
> > > >
> > > > As chair of the Security and Stability Advisory Committee, one
> > > > of the chartering organizations of the CCWG on Accountability,
> > > > we would like to submit the attached comments as fruit for thought for the discussions.
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > >
> > > >     Patrik Fältström
> > > >     Chair of the SSAC
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Ws2-hr mailing list
> > > > Ws2-hr at icann.org
> > > > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr
> > > --
> > > Dr Paul Twomey
> > > Managing Director
> > > Argo P at cific
> > >
> > > US Cell: +1 310 279 2366
> > > Aust M: +61 416 238 501
> > >
> > > www.argopacific.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Ws2-hr mailing list
> > > Ws2-hr at icann.org
> > > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr
> > >
>
> --
> Dr Paul Twomey
> Managing Director
> Argo P at cific
>
> US Cell: +1 310 279 2366
> Aust M: +61 416 238 501
>
> www.argopacific.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ws2-hr mailing list
> Ws2-hr at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-hr

--

Niels ten Oever
Head of Digital

Article 19
www.article19.org

PGP fingerprint    2458 0B70 5C4A FD8A 9488
                   643A 0ED8 3F3A 468A C8B3

________________________________

This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.