[WS2-Jurisdiction-Questionnaire] Questionnaire Response Analysis and Presentation: PLEASE SIGN UP.
parminder
parminder at itforchange.net
Tue May 9 16:28:33 UTC 2017
Thanks Greg
I opened the link but was not sure where to sign up...
And sure, anyone engaged in developing a response must not be analysing
it. Also yes I was involved in preparing the JNC response.
I have not read the responses yet, but what about I analysing the Swiss
response, which is the only Northern gov response that I can see in the
below.
Best, parminder
On Tuesday 09 May 2017 09:51 PM, Greg Shatan wrote:
> Parminder,
>
> Yes, the sign-up sheet is open (link was supplied), or you can send
> your request to this list and I'll add it to the sign-up sheet.
>
> Please keep in mind the rule I've suggested: "I suggest a rule that a
> team member cannot pick their own response (if they responded) -- any
> objections? This way, each presenter can be neutral about the
> response they are analyzing/presenting. The respondent will have
> ample time to comment on their response." It's my assumption that you
> were sufficiently involved with the Just Net Coalition response for
> this rule to apply.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Greg
>
> *Greg Shatan
> *C: 917-816-6428
> S: gsshatan
> gregshatanipc at gmail.com <mailto:gregshatanipc at gmail.com>
>
>
> On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 12:00 PM, parminder <parminder at itforchange.net
> <mailto:parminder at itforchange.net>> wrote:
>
> Greg
>
> Sorry but i have been engaged elsewhere.... Can I sign up now.
> parminder
>
>
> On Tuesday 09 May 2017 09:23 PM, Greg Shatan wrote:
>> Jurisdiction Questionnaire Response Evaluation Team:
>>
>> Last night I posted a sign-up sheet for members of this group to
>> take responsibility for analyzing and presenting at least one
>> questionnaire response. That sign-up sheet can be found at
>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Q948Ib31-Hu9Ro3_k9uVYBTwm72UDmkMvUWwU_XyHAI/edit?usp=sharing
>> <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Q948Ib31-Hu9Ro3_k9uVYBTwm72UDmkMvUWwU_XyHAI/edit?usp=sharing>.
>> Copies are attached as well.
>>
>> 1. There are only 7 responses that definitely need individual
>> analysis and presentation. Since there are 7 members of this
>> team (excluding myself), *each team member should pick one
>> response to analyze and present*. *PLEASE SIGN UP NOW.*
>>
>> I suggest a rule that a team member cannot pick their own
>> response (if they responded) -- any objections? This way, each
>> presenter can be neutral about the response they are
>> analyzing/presenting. The respondent will have ample time to
>> comment on their response.
>>
>> Alternatively, I can assign team members randomly to responses
>> (controlling for the "no-self-analysis/presentation" rule).
>>
>> These presentations will start at the next meeting, so at least
>> 3-4 presenters need to be ready for next week. The 7 responses are:
>>
>> * Mohammad Reza Mousavi (Iran)
>> * Just Net Coalition
>> * Farzaneh Badii - Internet Governance Project (USA)
>> * Rita Forsi (Italy)
>> * Ministry of Telecom and Mass Communications of the Russian
>> Federation
>> * Jorge Cancio, ".swiss" domain registry (Switzerland)
>> * Liu Yue, Internet Governance Research Center,Chinese Academy
>> of Information Communications and Technology (China)
>>
>>
>> 2. There are 5 responses that were classified "maybe" by staff
>> with regard to individual analysis and presentation. If anyone
>> believes that any of these */should/* be individually analyzed
>> and presented, please respond to this email. Otherwise, they
>> will */not/* be. The 5 are:
>>
>> * Vanda Scartezini (Brazil)
>> * Brian J. Winterfeldt (USA)
>> * Jesús Rivera (Venezuela GAC Representative)
>> * Lance Hinds (Govt Guyana)
>> * Ministry of ICT of Colombia | Jaifa Margarita Mezher Arango
>>
>> Thank you for signing up, for preparing to analyze and present,
>> and for considering whether any "maybe" responses should be
>> analyzed/presented.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Greg Shatan
>> *C: 917-816-6428 <tel:%28917%29%20816-6428>
>> S: gsshatan
>> gregshatanipc at gmail.com <mailto:gregshatanipc at gmail.com>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> WS2-Jurisdiction-Questionnaire mailing list
>> WS2-Jurisdiction-Questionnaire at icann.org
>> <mailto:WS2-Jurisdiction-Questionnaire at icann.org>
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction-questionnaire
>> <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction-questionnaire>
> _______________________________________________
> WS2-Jurisdiction-Questionnaire mailing list
> WS2-Jurisdiction-Questionnaire at icann.org
> <mailto:WS2-Jurisdiction-Questionnaire at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction-questionnaire
> <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction-questionnaire>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-jurisdiction-questionnaire/attachments/20170509/4c4aa93c/attachment.html>
More information about the WS2-Jurisdiction-Questionnaire
mailing list