[WS2-Jurisdiction-Questionnaire] Questionnaire Response Analysis and Presentation: PLEASE SIGN UP.

Tue May 9 16:55:36 UTC 2017

Yes Greg you are right, I meant in the geopolitical sense ... parminder

On Tuesday 09 May 2017 10:06 PM, Greg Shatan wrote:
> Parminder,
>
> That's fine, but note Bernie's update on the status of the Swiss
> translation.  You certainly can choose the Swiss submission regardless.
>
> In any event, just sign up under "Subteam member analyzing response."
>  I assume you are using North in the geo-political sense, rather than
> the purely geographic sense (since, e.g.,  Russia is in the geographic
> North)....
>
> Greg
>
> *Greg Shatan
> *C: 917-816-6428
> S: gsshatan
> gregshatanipc at gmail.com <mailto:gregshatanipc at gmail.com>
>
>
> On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 12:33 PM, Bernard Turcotte
> <turcotte.bernard at gmail.com <mailto:turcotte.bernard at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Parminder,
>
>     The Swiss reply translation from French to English is currently
>     being reviewed at the request of Jorge and so it not immediately
>     available but should be soon.
>
>     The Russian reply is currently available.
>
>     B.
>
>     On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 12:28 PM, parminder
>     <parminder at itforchange.net <mailto:parminder at itforchange.net>> wrote:
>
>         Thanks Greg
>
>         I opened the link but was not sure where to sign up...
>
>         And sure, anyone engaged in developing a response must not be
>         analysing it. Also yes I was involved in preparing the JNC
>         response.
>
>         I have not read the responses yet, but what about I analysing
>         the Swiss response, which is the only Northern gov response
>         that I can see in the below.
>
>         Best, parminder
>
>
>
>         On Tuesday 09 May 2017 09:51 PM, Greg Shatan wrote:
>>         Parminder,
>>
>>         Yes, the sign-up sheet is open (link was supplied), or you
>>         can send your request to this list and I'll add it to the
>>         sign-up sheet.  
>>
>>         Please keep in mind the rule I've suggested: "I suggest a
>>         rule that a team member cannot pick their own response (if
>>         they responded) -- any objections?  This way, each presenter
>>         can be neutral about the response they are
>>         analyzing/presenting.  The respondent will have ample time to
>>         comment on their response."  It's my assumption that you were
>>         sufficiently involved with the Just Net Coalition response
>>         for this rule to apply. 
>>
>>         Thanks!
>>
>>         Greg
>>
>>         *Greg Shatan
>>         *C: 917-816-6428 <tel:%28917%29%20816-6428>
>>         S: gsshatan
>>         gregshatanipc at gmail.com <mailto:gregshatanipc at gmail.com>
>>
>>
>>         On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 12:00 PM, parminder
>>         <parminder at itforchange.net
>>         <mailto:parminder at itforchange.net>> wrote:
>>
>>             Greg
>>
>>             Sorry but i have been engaged elsewhere.... Can I sign up
>>             now. parminder
>>
>>
>>             On Tuesday 09 May 2017 09:23 PM, Greg Shatan wrote:
>>>             Jurisdiction Questionnaire Response Evaluation Team:
>>>
>>>             Last night I posted a sign-up sheet for members of this
>>>             group to take responsibility for analyzing and
>>>             presenting at least one questionnaire response.  That
>>>             sign-up sheet can be found at
>>>              https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Q948Ib31-Hu9Ro3_k9uVYBTwm72UDmkMvUWwU_XyHAI/edit?usp=sharing
>>>             <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Q948Ib31-Hu9Ro3_k9uVYBTwm72UDmkMvUWwU_XyHAI/edit?usp=sharing>. 
>>>             Copies are attached as well.
>>>
>>>             1.  There are only 7 responses that definitely need
>>>             individual analysis and presentation.  Since there are 7
>>>             members of this team (excluding myself), *each team
>>>             member should pick one response to analyze and present*.
>>>              *PLEASE SIGN UP NOW.*
>>>
>>>             I suggest a rule that a team member cannot pick their
>>>             own response (if they responded) -- any objections? 
>>>             This way, each presenter can be neutral about the
>>>             response they are analyzing/presenting.  The respondent
>>>             will have ample time to comment on their response.  
>>>
>>>             Alternatively, I can assign team members randomly to
>>>             responses (controlling for the
>>>             "no-self-analysis/presentation" rule).  
>>>
>>>             These presentations will start at the next meeting, so
>>>             at least 3-4 presenters need to be ready for next week. 
>>>             The 7 responses are:
>>>
>>>               * Mohammad Reza Mousavi (Iran)
>>>               * Just Net Coalition
>>>               * Farzaneh Badii - Internet Governance Project (USA)
>>>               * Rita Forsi (Italy)
>>>               * Ministry of Telecom and Mass Communications of the
>>>                 Russian Federation
>>>               * Jorge Cancio, ".swiss" domain registry (Switzerland)
>>>               * Liu Yue, Internet Governance Research Center,Chinese
>>>                 Academy of Information Communications and Technology
>>>                 (China)
>>>
>>>
>>>             2.  There are 5 responses that were classified "maybe"
>>>             by staff with regard to individual analysis and
>>>             presentation.  If anyone believes that any of these
>>>             */should/* be individually analyzed and presented,
>>>             please respond to this email.  Otherwise, they will
>>>             */not/* be.  The 5 are:
>>>
>>>               * Vanda Scartezini (Brazil)
>>>               * Brian J. Winterfeldt (USA)
>>>               * Jesús Rivera (Venezuela GAC Representative)
>>>               * Lance Hinds (Govt Guyana)
>>>               * Ministry of ICT of Colombia | Jaifa Margarita Mezher
>>>                 Arango
>>>
>>>             Thank you for signing up, for preparing to analyze and
>>>             present, and for considering whether any "maybe"
>>>             responses should be analyzed/presented.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>             *Greg Shatan
>>>             *C: 917-816-6428 <tel:%28917%29%20816-6428>
>>>             S: gsshatan
>>>             gregshatanipc at gmail.com <mailto:gregshatanipc at gmail.com>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>             _______________________________________________
>>>             WS2-Jurisdiction-Questionnaire mailing list
>>>             WS2-Jurisdiction-Questionnaire at icann.org
>>>             <mailto:WS2-Jurisdiction-Questionnaire at icann.org>
>>>             https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction-questionnaire
>>>             <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction-questionnaire>
>>             _______________________________________________
>>             WS2-Jurisdiction-Questionnaire mailing list
>>             WS2-Jurisdiction-Questionnaire at icann.org
>>             <mailto:WS2-Jurisdiction-Questionnaire at icann.org>
>>             https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction-questionnaire
>>             <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction-questionnaire>
>>
>>
>         _______________________________________________
>         WS2-Jurisdiction-Questionnaire mailing list
>         WS2-Jurisdiction-Questionnaire at icann.org
>         <mailto:WS2-Jurisdiction-Questionnaire at icann.org>
>         https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction-questionnaire
>         <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction-questionnaire>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-jurisdiction-questionnaire/attachments/20170509/b98c833d/attachment-0001.html>