[Ws2-jurisdiction] WRITTEN ANSWERS TO THE QUESTIONS RAISED DURING THE CALL

[León Felipe Sánchez Ambía]

Dear all,

Let me, once again, call everyone to remain respectful and collegiate as our group has characterized to be since the beginning.

We are all volunteers and we all deserve respect to the work we do and to our points of view. 

I understand there might be frustration when our views do not gain traction at a subgroup level but we need to keep our energy focused on building solutions and in line with our working methods. That is, if a subgroup considers that a given request is relevant to the work the subgroup is carrying then the subgroup may request follow up or action on the item. If the subgroup considers a given topic or request does not seem to add to the subgroups work at that particular point in time, then the subgroup members are encouraged to focus their energy in continue to build consensus on the topics being discussed.

That doesn’t rule out, of course, any views or requests but it does subject said views or requests to the decision making process of each subgroup or the plenary as the case may be.

My respect and recognition to all members and participants of the different subgroups. Let us continue in good spirit the work that we have been trusted with.

Kind regards,



León

> El 01/08/2017, a las 16:35, Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com> escribió:
> 
> Greg
> What do you mean by sub group decides 
> You  are blocking all my roquets
> I raised questions they were answered incomplete or not answered at all
> This  us my  right to ask written answer and gas nothing to do with the approval if the group    
> I am tired of thus sort of 
> blacking.
> You are not acting properly and I formally register complaint for such unfair tressent.
> Your behaviour is not acceptable and categorically rejected
> I do not agree that you treat a member of the group so aggressively
> You have interrupted me with an unprecedented behaviour
> Pls explain.
> You act negatively to all my proposal
> You di not want to find a solution for these problems
> You just wasting our time 
> We disagree with your working method.
> Either behave or .....
> Reply. Explain
> There are motivation behind your
>  unfair actions
> Kavouss
>  
> 
>  
>  
>     
>   
> 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On 1 Aug 2017, at 21:55, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com <mailto:gregshatanipc at gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>> Kavouss, 
>> 
>> Kindly direct your request to the Subgroup, and not to Sam.  This is a matter for the Subgroup to consider, rather than any individual participant.  The Subgroup can take up your request and decide whether to ask for written responses to questions (and if so, which questions).  Thank you.
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> 
>> Greg
>> 
>> On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com <mailto:kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> Dear Sam, With tks to your presentation, pls kindly note that I nned written answers to the questions raised before the meeting and those during the meeing either as intervention or in the chat.
>> Regards
>> Kavouss
>> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-jurisdiction/attachments/20170801/0745b966/attachment.html>