[Ws2-jurisdiction] Mandate and Scope of Jurisdiction Subgroup will be on Tuesday's Agenda

[Bernard Turcotte]

Re schedule

The next Jurisdiction call is noted on the master calendar as Thursday 8
June 1300 which was confirmed with a calendar invite.

Greg could you please advise if this is incorrect.

Thanks

B.

On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 7:57 AM, CW Mail <mail at christopherwilkinson.eu>
wrote:

> Good afternoon:
>
> Returning from four days off-line in Edinburgh, I find that the schedule
> is problematic.
>
> 1.      My Calendar has this down for Thursday, 13.00 UTC.
>
> 2.      That was confirmed during the most recent call on Tusday 30 May:
> Point 8.1 of the Agenda.
>
> 3.      Unless I am mistaken, we have not yet received the Staff
> announcement of Calls for the week of 5 June.
>
> Regards
>
> CW
>
>
>
> On 04 Jun 2017, at 23:39, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > I wanted to provide advance notice that we will pick up the discussion
> of the Subgroup's Mandate and Scope on Tuesday's call, with the goal of
> settling the issue over this call and the next. After all, we need to know
> what our mandate is in order to know if we ar fulfilling it. Some notes:
> >
> > 1. It's not up to the Subgroup to define the Subgroup's mandate and
> Scope. This has been done in the foundational documents -- Charter. WS 1
> Report and Transition Bylaw. What we need to do is clarify our
> understanding of that mandate and Scope.
> >
> > 2. As such, the foundational documents need to form both the basis and
> the boundary of any such clarification or proposal for clarification. These
> documents were excerpted in my "straw man" mandate document sent around in
> the last few weeks.
> >
> > 3. Mandate and Scope (defined in these documents) need to be
> distinguished from potential issues participants might raise. Such issues,
> by and large, are not mentioned in the foundational documents.
> >
> > 4. The Mandate and Scope will be used to determine if any potential
> issue is "in scope".
> >
> > 5. Discussions of the issue on the list in advance of the call will be
> most helpful, since the call is only an hour.
> >
> > 6. While some have said we have gone in circles on this issue, or
> avoided resolving it. The goal here and now is to avoid that fate, whatever
> the outcome might be.
> >
> > Finally, I request broad participation on this issue, even if you have
> given up on this subject of discussion.
> >
> > Thank you.
> >
> > Greg
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list
> > Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list
> Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-jurisdiction/attachments/20170606/b48cbd31/attachment.html>