[Ws2-jurisdiction] Question Presented

[John Laprise]

+1

 

Best regards, 

 

John Laprise, Ph.D.

Principal Consultant

 

 <http://www.linkedin.com/in/jplaprise/> http://www.linkedin.com/in/jplaprise/

 

 

 

From: ws2-jurisdiction-bounces at icann.org [mailto:ws2-jurisdiction-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Mueller, Milton L
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 9:40 AM
To: Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com>; ws2-jurisdiction <ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org>
Cc: acct-staff at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Ws2-jurisdiction] Question Presented

 

Please pardon my late intervention. We were presented with this question:

 

Question: Is considering or recommending changes to ICANN's status as a not-for-profit California corporation within the scope of the Subgroup?

 

Two things seem obvious to me:

1.	The issue IS within the intended scope of the subgroup, and 
2.	There is overwhelming consensus AGAINST recommending changes to ICANN’s status as a nonprofit California public benefit corporation. 

 

It seems to me that most of the debate is confusing issue #1 with issue #2. The entire discussion has not developed any real alternative, much less a clearly superior one, to California jurisdiction. The identified problems with US jurisdiction (mainly OFAC) can be addressed without moving ICANN’s place of incorporation. So let’s stop trying to dishonestly pre-empt resolution of the jurisdiction issue by ruling certain discussions “out of scope.”  Let’s resolve it honestly by developing and acknowledging consensus around the fact that other than the meaningless mirage of “international jurisdiction” there is no better framework within which to work than California law. 

 

The debate about scope, in other words, is a diversion from the substantive issue, and I wish the chairs and the Americans in the subgroup would stop trying to pre-empt substantive debate with scope debate. 

 

I will not be in Johannesburg so I hope people who agree with me can take this perspective into the f2f meeting.

 

Dr. Milton L. Mueller

Professor, School of Public Policy

Georgia Institute of Technology

 

 

 

 

From: ws2-jurisdiction-bounces at icann.org <mailto:ws2-jurisdiction-bounces at icann.org>  [mailto:ws2-jurisdiction-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Greg Shatan
Sent: Thursday, June 8, 2017 9:29 AM
To: ws2-jurisdiction <ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org <mailto:ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org> >
Cc: acct-staff at icann.org <mailto:acct-staff at icann.org> 
Subject: [Ws2-jurisdiction] Question Presented

 

Please see attached.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-jurisdiction/attachments/20170619/bcbdd679/attachment-0001.html>