[Ws2-jurisdiction] Further actions on my latest MODIFIED /Softened SUGGESTIONS

[Greg Shatan]

Kavouss,

As previously noted, I have responded in detail (twice) regarding the
remaining elements of your suggested text.  Please read these responses.  I
assure you it will take far less time to read them than it took me to write
them.  Please reply to the points raised in these responses if you have any
remaining concerns.

Best regards,

Greg

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 4:12 AM, Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Greg
> In addition to the elements of my last proposal that you have  included in
> the last version you have posted quite recently , I have had other
> proposal  which I did ask you to look at them and include them either in
> the itroduction ,as relevant, or preamble to the Recommendation . See below
>
> Greg
> *1.The last sentence reads” unless the results of the study demonstrate
> that it would be inappropriate for ICANN to pursue these licenses.”To this
> effect the first sentensce below “ what Criteria……inappropriate Because you
> qualify the study by being inappropriate and I did suggest what criteria
> will be use to make the judgement *
> *Thus the first sentence would fir .You may include my comment by
> modifying the sentence as follows *
> *UNLESS ,USING APPROPRIATE CRITERIA, THE RESULTS OF STUDY DEMONSTRATE THAT
> IT WOULD BE INAPPROPRIATE FOR ICANN TO PURSUE THESE STUDIES*.
> This has been covered in part
>
>
>
> 2.
>
> *Generally, ICANN  should pursue the application for general license at
> arliest time and should  remind the registries not to copy and paste the
> general agreements found in US-based registrars. *
>
> *This also fits*
>
>  This has been covered in part
>
> 3. The role of ICANN, to make awareness about such situation is critical
> and should not be undermined.
> *This part is talking about awareness that was extensively discussed and
> thus fits *
> This has been covered in part
>
> *4. There are several reports in the media that US-Based and Non-US
> registrars have asked registrants to transfer out their domains immediately
> because they might get affected by US sanctions*
> *This could be included in appropriate part .if it does not fit with the
> recommends part *
> This has NOT been covered in part
> *5.Examples of that are related to Godaddy and Online Nic, which made
> pressure against registrants having citizenship of Sanction coountries.
> This could be included in the introductory part of the OFAC sanctions and
> registrar*
> This has NOT been covered in part
> *6 Registrars  should be reminded that they should not normally examine
> zero risk policy in regard of penalties imposed by OFAC.*
> *This could be included either in the recommends part or preamble of the
> recommend part *
> This seems not covered.
> Pls kindly advise about those which are not covered in any part of the
> report or if covered , I have nor seen it
> I am grateful to you for that guidance
> Regards
> Kavouss
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-jurisdiction/attachments/20170921/c5a9b360/attachment.html>