[Ws2-ombudsman] CCWG-Accountability-WS2-Ombudsman-DrafRecommendationsV1.3.3

[Cheryl Langdon-Orr]

I am afraid I will be an apology for this call at 1300, right now, I simply
can not manage three and four late night calls followed by 0300 starts at
the moment... and obviously I would not need my usual dial out for the
meeting.

Sorry, I have however note below a few minor points regarding the report,
that I would have brought up if I was attending, I hope they can be
considered and be of use in your deliberations.


   1. Typo Page 4 Para 1, Line 2  "charge"  should read  'charged'.
   2. Comment SB1; noting Phil Koury's comment regarding an 'ethics
   committee' and the Independent Examiners concept and motivations in
   proposing the Advisory Panel, I would suggest we leave our text as
   currently written as "Advisory Panel", we of course can make other
   adjustments and clarifications, if needs be, when discussing and or
   chartering such a panel.
   3. Comment SB2; Have we as yet received this legal advice? I believe we
   would need to have this before further consideration of this point.
   4. Comment SB3; Whilst I might debate and disagree with a number of the
   points Farzaneh has made on this matter, and recently reiterated under
   separate cover to the list, I do agree that the mechanism to review the
   employment contracts of the Ombuds Office staff is only one way the
   important matter of the Independence of the Office can and should be
   addressed, therefore I do agree with  the proposal to expand this section,
   but from the printed in PDF comment I can make no sense of the " ... ....
   ...." as written, however additional text that goes something like "9 - It
   is identified that there needs to be efforts made to improve the
   independence of the ICANN Ombuds Office. One mechanism for consideration to
   increase this independence is the consideration at this time of the
   revision of the Ombuds employment contracts to ... ... ... ... "
   5. ?Format issue Page 22, Sec 3.0 => the bullet points in the second
   level indent list [o] are not a single list, this needs review/fixing I
   assume.
   6.  I am sure this will be added but we do need to have the Independent
   Examiners Report added to Appendix B.




*Cheryl Langdon-O**rr ...  *(CLO)

about.me/cheryl.LangdonOrr
[image: Cheryl Langdon-Orr on about.me]
  <http://about.me/cheryl.LangdonOrr>


On 10 September 2017 at 23:40, Bernard Turcotte <turcotte.bernard at gmail.com>
wrote:

> All,
>
> Sebastien has asked that I forward the draft of the report (attached) for
> consideration at the next meeting of the Ombuds sub-group meeting scheduled
> for 1300UTC Monday 11 September.
>
> Bernard Turcotte
> ICANN Staff Support to the CCWG-Accountability-WS2
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ws2-ombudsman mailing list
> Ws2-ombudsman at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-ombudsman
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ws2-ombudsman/attachments/20170911/de642c60/attachment.html>