[CCWG-ACCT] Minority statement review process (Was Re: Minority Statements)

[Seun Ojedeji]

Dear Co-Chairs,

I understand that minority statements are allowed. However may I know how
the group intend to respond to those statements. Will they be addressed
along side comments received from public comment after the closure of the
current PC? Or they will not be addressed but included as part of the
annexes in the final documents?

I am asking because I personally find a few sections of Edward's minority
statements unacceptable, which could actually trigger a minority statement
from me as well depending on how this CCWG intends to handle minority
statements.

Regards
On 1 Aug 2015 1:11 pm, "Edward Morris" <egmorris1 at toast.net> wrote:

> About twenty minutes ago I submitted directly to the Chairs, per the
> instructions given to us by Thomas in his email of 29 July, two minority
> statements for (hopefully) inclusion in the report about to be released for
> public comment. I had not intended to file any minority statement but, upon
> reflection, two aspects of our proposal caused me concern.
>
> The statements are attached here for community inspection and review.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Edward Morris
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150801/8128c405/attachment.html>