[CCWG-ACCT] Notes-Recordings-Transcript links for CCWG ACCT Meeting #50 - 25 August

[James Gannon]

Hi All,

For those of us who couldn’t make the call could the below section of the notes be elaborated on?
Its not very clear if this is referring to the IFO/PTI separation process post-IFR or to some other process.
If its referring to the SCWG as defined by the CWG I don’t understand why that would be a CCWG task rather than a CWG task.

-James



On 25 Aug 2015, at 08:49, Brenda Brewer <brenda.brewer at icann.org<mailto:brenda.brewer at icann.org>> wrote:

3 CWG requirement on Separation CCWG
- Stems from ICG report that states that separation process is kicked off by a working group based on CCWG proposal. Should we build
separate process or can we use existing mechanism to set up group?
Feedback:
- It is too early to discuss separation and for CCWG to get involved in matters. Suggest that Cochairs discuss with CWG leadership.
- Where is it noted that we need to specify process?
- ICG proposal states that CCWG needs to define process.
ACTION ITEM - Cochairs to send an email to group with references included. Put status of discussion in email and seek confirmation of
approach or go with different proposal.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150825/bd719933/attachment.html>