[CCWG-ACCT] Notes-Recordings-Transcript links for CCWG ACCT Meeting #50 - 25 August

[Avri Doria]

Hi,

It has to do with the results from a SCWG.  Which while defined in some
detail in ANNEX L (page 198 of the ICG proposal), also refers  to the
CCWG model. 

- the use of remediation as determined in the CCWG if the Board rejects
an IFR recommendation for a SCWG
- the approval of a SCWG determined new operator selection

Beyond that there needs to be the fundamental bylaw that refers to both
the IFR and the SCWG.  I think that is an implementation issue.

One thing I had forgotten about is the statement & conditional footnote
in the CWG proposal that says:

> The selection of a new operator to perform the IANA Naming Functions
> or other separation process will be subject to approval by the ICANN
> Board, and a community mechanism derived from the CCWG-Accountability
> process.83
> 83 This community mechanism could include ICANN membership, if ICANN
> were to become a membership organization per the CCWG-Accountability
> work efforts.

We have not included this among the community powers of the SMCM.

avri




On 25-Aug-15 05:15, James Gannon wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> For those of us who couldn’t make the call could the below section of
> the notes be elaborated on?
> Its not very clear if this is referring to the IFO/PTI separation
> process post-IFR or to some other process.
> If its referring to the SCWG as defined by the CWG I don’t understand
> why that would be a CCWG task rather than a CWG task.
>
> -James
>
>
>
>> On 25 Aug 2015, at 08:49, Brenda Brewer <brenda.brewer at icann.org
>> <mailto:brenda.brewer at icann.org>> wrote:
>>
>> *3 CWG requirement on Separation CCWG*
>>
>> - Stems from ICG report that states that separation process is kicked off by a working group based on CCWG proposal. Should we build 
>> separate process or can we use existing mechanism to set up group?
>> _Feedback:_
>> - It is too early to discuss separation and for CCWG to get involved in matters. Suggest that Cochairs discuss with CWG leadership.
>> - Where is it noted that we need to specify process?
>> - ICG proposal states that CCWG needs to define process. 
>> ACTION ITEM - Cochairs to send an email to group with references included. Put status of discussion in email and seek confirmation of 
>> approach or go with different proposal.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus