[CCWG-ACCT] Blog: Updating our Community on our Review of the CCWG-Accountability Proposal

[Kavouss Arasteh]

Dear Grace,
Thank you vbery much for the message.
CCWG needs to consider.
1. The need for physical meeting in LA, together with its timing probably
23-24 September, if CCWG AGREE
2. Before the issue is discussed with Board, it seems premature to have
public meeting as there must be some  exchange of views  and opinion that
should be first discussed between CCWG and the Board which ,in any case,
would be VIRTUALLY  public .
The matter needs to be discussed by CCWG at its next call and the Board
should formally ask for such arrangements, unless CCWG,  the message just
received from Bruce as reflecting the Board's view and NOT only one Board
member.
We need to work properly ,efficiently and formall
In fact I( KAVOUSSARASTEH)proposed a virtual meeting with Board as soon as
we received clarifications which are being sought by CCWG
Regards
Kavouss  .

2015-08-26 21:10 GMT+02:00 Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad at icann.org>:

> Original link:
> https://www.icann.org/news/blog/updating-our-community-on-our-review-of-the-ccwg-accountability-proposal
>
> The Board is deeply engaged in reviewing the CCWG-Accountability proposal
> and has actively participated in the process. Consistent with our
> commitment to transparency, we would like to share with the Community the
> steps in our review process.
>
> Last week, the ICANN Board submitted a preliminary set of comments
> <http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-ccwg-accountability-03aug15/msg00006.html> to
> the CCWG-Accountability Public Comment forum. The Board remains committed
> to engaging and working with the CCWG on solutions to address concerns
> raised in its preliminary set of comments.
>
> A subset of ICANN Board Members and Staff Members have been meeting in
> Washington, DC on Tuesday and Wednesday this week to further consider the
> CCWG proposal and commence a review of an impact analysis from ICANN's
> external counsel. As part of this meeting, the group held a call together
> with the CCWG Chairs. For full transparency and to clarify the basis for
> the review points and comments,ICANN will share the impact analysis and
> publish it in the CCWG Public Comment forum. The Board welcomes feedback
> from the CCWG on the impact analysis as it finalizes its responses to the
> CCWG proposal in the Public Comment forum.
>
> Next week, consistent with the CCWG request, the Board will have an open
> teleconference with the CCWG to help inform the Board's development of its
> comments to be submitted into the Public Comment forum before the close of
> the comment period on 12 September. Call details will be announced so that
> anyone in the community may participate.
>
> Finally, in light of the importance of these discussions, we propose that
> the CCWG-Accountability hold a public meeting in Los Angeles in late
> September to continue the dialogue with the Board on the CCWG proposal.
>
> As part of the ICANN community, we will continue to work constructively
> to help the CCWG finalize the proposal to achieve a successful IANA Stewardship
> transition and an ICANN with enhanced accountability. We remain
> appreciative of the CCWG's valuable work.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150826/7ebbce41/attachment.html>