[CCWG-ACCT] FW: FY16 Appropriations Act Extends IANA Transition Freeze without DOTCOM Act

[Dr Eberhard W Lisse]

I firmly believe it is property.  

And if it so, only Congress can decide what to do with it. In this, the junior Senator from Alberta is correct. 

And in any case, most certainly are they not just going to wash their hands off it. 


el
-- 
Sent from Dr Lisse's iPad mini

> On 17 Dec 2015, at 22:18, Eric Brunner-Williams <ebw at abenaki.wabanaki.net> wrote:
> [...]
> 
> What concerns me (and I don't expect this is a shared concern) the most in the "falling off the end of the contract period" scenario is the possibility of the USG abandoning property to the incumbent contractor, and third-parties, from tax crusaders to market monopolists taking this -- an improper disposal of government property -- to the courts.

[...]