[CCWG-ACCT] CCWG list summary, Jan 30 to Feb 5

[Avri Doria]

Hi,

On 18-Feb-15 11:51, "Carlos Raúl G." wrote:
>> So perhaps we should be considering "public interest consistent with
>> human rights."
>
> Within ICANN narrowly define technical scope??!

Of course it needs to be in scope.  and yet that scope is as hard to
define as public interest is.  For example, by my definition of
'technical', ICANN does almost nothing technical outside of IANA, unless
you include IT..

But over the years the technical scope has been defined in an ICANN
context to include all kinds of policy stuff that can be defined as
technical in perhaps a legal, financial or organizational context.  The
boarders on that definition are fuzzy at best.

But if we want to add further conditionalizing words, we could say

"public interest consistent with human rights and within ICANN's scope."

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150218/9ebc3571/attachment.html>