[CCWG-ACCT] On the definition of public interest

[Dr Eberhard W Lisse]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

And we need to make extremely clear what "public interest" or even
"interest" means with regards to incumbent ccTLD Managers.  And
other entities having a bilateral relationship with ICANN.

greetings, el

el

On 2015-02-18 19:24 , "Carlos Raúl G." wrote:
> Dear Robin, Avri,
> 
> Prof.  Scott Hempling, of Georgetown University who is a specialist
> in regulatory law has a very good one.  I know that the Internet is
> ver special and very different from 20th century public utilities,
> but sometimes past experience does help.......
> 
> Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez +506 8837 7176 (New Number) Enviado desde mi
> iPhone
> 
> El feb 18, 2015, a las 12:02, Robin Gross <robin at ipjustice.org>
> escribió:
> 
>>>> "public interest consistent with human rights and within 
>>>> ICANN's scope."
>> 
>> 
>> This is a good compromise and sufficiently addresses my concern 
>> that "public interest" alone is too vague and subject to
>> numerous conflicting interpretations.
>> 
>> Thank you, Robin
>> 
>>> On Feb 18, 2015, at 9:56 AM, Carlos Raúl G. wrote:
>>> 
>>> I like It Thanks
>>> 
>>> Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez +506 8837 7176 (New Number) Enviado desde
>>> mi iPhone
>>> 
>>>> El feb 18, 2015, a las 11:36, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org>
>>>> escribió:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>>>> On 18-Feb-15 11:51, "Carlos Raúl G." wrote: So perhaps we
>>>>>> should be considering "public interest consistent with
>>>>>> human rights."
>>>>> 
>>>>> Within ICANN narrowly define technical scope??!
>>>> 
>>>> Of course it needs to be in scope.  and yet that scope is as 
>>>> hard to define as public interest is.  For example, by my 
>>>> definition of 'technical', ICANN does almost nothing
>>>> technical outside of IANA, unless you include IT..
>>>> 
>>>> But over the years the technical scope has been defined in
>>>> an ICANN context to include all kinds of policy stuff that
>>>> can be defined as technical in perhaps a legal, financial or 
>>>> organizational context.  The boarders on that definition are 
>>>> fuzzy at best.
>>>> 
>>>> But if we want to add further conditionalizing words, we
>>>> could say
>>>> 
>>>> "public interest consistent with human rights and within 
>>>> ICANN's scope."
[...]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=wC5F
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----