[CCWG-ACCT] CCWG list summary, Jan 30 to Feb 5

[Greg Shatan]

I agree with Avri.  Further, Board B seems to become some kind of mutant
hybrid of Board and management, which should be different roles.

While we can always explore it fully (within some sense of time
constraints), I would not see much mileage in doing so.

Greg

On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:

>  Hi,
>
> I have never understood the appeal of such a model.  To me it seems like
> twice as much Board to worry about in an environment of never really
> knowing where the ultimate responsibility lay.
>
> avri
>
> On 19-Feb-15 13:00, Mr R.T. Daniel wrote:
>
> Thinking out loud.
> So is there any mileage in having an icann A & icann B.
> "A" board = public interest & contract co.
> "B" board private non profit implementing Board A 's ..policy
> frameworks....etc...etc..
> Board B answerable to board A?
> RD
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20150220/57a92a65/attachment.html>