[CCWG-Accountability] Accountability Definitions and scoping

[Roelof Meijer]

Good changes/additions in my opinion, Mathieu, the document is really
shaping up.

cheers,

Roelof




On 16-01-15 21:50, "Mathieu Weill" <mathieu.weill at afnic.fr> wrote:

>Dear Colleagues,
>
>Attached is the latest version of the definitions and scoping document.
>
>Main edits and points for discussion in Frankfurt are :
>- transfer of most affected parties into directly affected parties, and
>flagging whether they are affected through contracts, individual
>decisions and/or policy (as to outcome of our call #6)
>- refinement of definition of review mechanisms vs redress mechanisms,
>following discussion on WA1 mailing list
>- small edit regarding purpose of accountability
>
>Please also note that the proposed definitions of "independence" have
>not yet been discussed.
>
>The document is also available through the Frankfurt meeting agenda on
>the wiki 
>(https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=51414991).
>
>See you all in Frankfurt
>
>Best
>Mathieu
>
>Le 12/01/2015 18:53, Mathieu Weill a écrit :
>> Dear Colleagues,
>>
>> In anticipation of the call tomorrow, please find an updated version
>> of the draft document mentioned below.
>>
>> Main edits include :
>> - alternate proposal to capture the discussion around purpose of
>> accountability during last week's call
>> - various comments from Kavouss
>> - other minor edits following feedbacks received off list
>>
>> Best,
>> Mathieu
>> PS: edits are apparent in this version
>>
>> Le 05/01/2015 16:44, Mathieu Weill a écrit :
>>> Dear Colleagues,
>>>
>>> Please find attached a document drafted by the co-Chairs intended to
>>> provide baseline definitions for our work. It is designed to address
>>> some of the early questions we raised such as to whom should Icann be
>>> accountable ? What is the purpose of Icann's accountability ? or what
>>> is accountability ?
>>>
>>> We provide the document for your reading before the meeting but I
>>> will introduce the document during our call tomorrow, and comments
>>> will be welcome during the call or after on this email thread.
>>>
>>> We are well aware of the importance of the choice of words in the
>>> definitions and of their consequences for guiding the work of our
>>> group going forward. This document is a strawman, so feedback in the
>>> form of proposed edits will be much appreciated.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>
>
>-- 
>*****************************
>Mathieu WEILL
>AFNIC - directeur général
>Tél: +33 1 39 30 83 06
>mathieu.weill at afnic.fr
>Twitter : @mathieuweill
>*****************************
>