[CCWG-ACCT] got some lawyerly answers on membership structure

[Dr Eberhard Lisse]

I forgot,

Kieran is right, part of this is the processes / "tick the box"
mentality, for whatever reason, including a lack of accountability
:-)-O

el

On 2015-01-29 07:54 , Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
> Chris,
> 
> that may be so, though I disagree, again because it does not work
> for the non-members of the ccNSO, it does not address the
> bilateral relationship, and, more importantly it has failed.
> 
> And the Board is at fault there too.
> 
> Railroading the incumbent ccTLD Manager, putting un-consented
> revocation and transfer on the consent agenda, ticking off check
> lists without looking beyond "traffic lights", issuing boilerplate
> "rationales" are as wrong as serious misconduct of proposed
> (incoming) ccTLD Managers such as repatriating a ccTLD from inside
> the country to a foreign spam haven within minutes after the
> transfer.  And you know exactly who I mean.
> 
> What we need to do is to get the FoI Principles established.
> 
> And, come to think of it, as far as the ccNSO is concerned (as per
> your suggestion) we can just run them as a PDP because all the
> heavy lifting has been done, and the ccNSO unanimously approves of
> them.  Maybe we can even fast track them.
> 
> We also need the IANA function Manager to publish ALL criteria it
> requires from a proposed (incoming) Manager.  it would even make
> applications easier to make, and to evaluate.
> 
> greetings, el
> 
> 
> Sent from Dr Lisse's iPad mini
> 
> On Jan 29, 2015, at 01:21, Chris Disspain <ceo at auda.org.au
> <mailto:ceo at auda.org.au>> wrote:
> 
>>>   * These problems exist today, under the current IANA/ICANN
>>>   arrangement.
>>
>>
>>> In short, I don’t think we should give up on one or more
>>> proposals that do not solve everyone’s issues.
>>
>> Agree James.  Speaking on behalf of auDA I believe that the ccTLD
>> community should solve the issues being debated on this thread,
>> not the CCWG. Some of the over-arching accountability mechanisms
>> the CCWG ends up recommending may well be useful for ccTLDs in
>> certain circumstances BUT a ccTLD specific mechanism to deal with
>> re-delegation ‘disputes’ is a matter for the ccTLD community
>> to create and for the ccNSO to then endorse under its policy
>> development process.
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>>
>> Chris Disspain| Chief Executive Officer
>>
>> .au Domain Administration Ltd
>>
>> [...]
>>

-- 
Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse			4-5 St Annes Walk, Alderney
<directors at omadhina.net>		Guernsey, GY9 3JZ
Omadhina Internet Services Ltd		British Channel Islands

-- 
Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse  \        / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar)
el at lisse.NA            / *     |   Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell)
PO Box 8421             \     /
Bachbrecht, Namibia     ;____/