[CCWG-ACCT] got some lawyerly answers on membership structure

[Dr Eberhard W Lisse]

James,

the "failed" refers to Chris' suggestion that the ccNSO can set policy
successfully.

And I stand by this.

el

On 2015-01-29 17:54 , James M. Bladel wrote:
> Hi Eberhard:
> 
> To your point here:
> "that may be so, though I disagree, again because it does not work for
> the non-members of the ccNSO, it does not address the bilateral
> relationship, and, more importantly it has failed. “
> 
> I don’t think “failed” is the right term, versus “doesn’t go far enough”
> or “is incomplete.”    If a proposal were to be an improvement for all
> SO/ACs, -except- the ccNSO,  and (also importantly)  it does not create
> harm or exacerbate existing problems, then I think we should not reject
> it, but consider it part of the solution package and keep working.
> 
> Thanks—
> 
> J.
[...]
-- 
Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse  \        / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar)
el at lisse.NA            / *     |   Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell)
PO Box 8421             \     /
Bachbrecht, Namibia     ;____/